Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35856080›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2022

Using deep learning-based natural language processing to identify reasons for statin nonuse in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Ashish Sarraju, Jean Coquet, Alban Zammit, Antonia Chan, Summer Ngo, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Fatima Rodriguez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Obicetrapib-the Rebirth of CETP Inhibitors?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Natural Language Processing Methods to Identify Oncology Patients at High Risk for Acute Care with Clinical Notes.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ashish Sarraju *Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Jean Coquet *Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7008-6925
Alban ZammitDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2524-1113
Antonia ChanDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Summer NgoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Tina Hernandez-BoussardDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6553-3455
Fatima RodriguezDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5226-0723
Cardiovascular Institute of the South · USStanford University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

SURPASS: (Statin Use and Risk Prediction of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in minority Subgroups)K01HL144607 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RODRIGUEZ, FATIMA · 2019 to 2023
$856k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL144607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Statins conclusively decrease mortality in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), the leading cause of death worldwide, and are strongly recommended by guidelines. However, real-world statin utilization and persistence are low, resulting in excess mortality. Identifying reasons for statin nonuse at scale across health systems is crucial to developing targeted interventions to improve statin use. Methods: We developed and validated deep learning-based natural language processing (NLP) approaches (Clinical Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers [BERT]) to classify statin nonuse and reasons for statin nonuse using unstructured electronic health records (EHRs) from a diverse healthcare system. Results: We present data from a cohort of 56,530 ASCVD patients, among whom 21,508 (38%) lack guideline-directed statin prescriptions and statins listed as allergies in structured EHR portions. Of these 21,508 patients without prescriptions, only 3,929 (18%) have any discussion of statin use or nonuse in EHR documentation. The NLP classifiers identify statin nonuse with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI 0.93-0.96) and reasons for nonuse with a weighted-average AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.86-0.91) when evaluated against manual expert chart review in a held-out test set. Clinical BERT identifies key patient-level reasons (side-effects, patient preference) and clinician-level reasons (guideline-discordant practices) for statin nonuse, including differences by type of ASCVD and patient race/ethnicity. Conclusions: Our deep learning NLP classifiers can identify crucial gaps in statin nonuse and reasons for nonuse in high-risk populations to support education, clinical decision support, and potential pathways for health systems to address ASCVD treatment gaps.

Indexed as

CardiologyCardiovascular diseasesComputational biology and bioinformaticsDisease preventionHealth services

Identifiers

PMID35856080
PMCPMC9287295
OpenAlexW4285591452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.