ArticleCommunications medicine2022
Using deep learning-based natural language processing to identify reasons for statin nonuse in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Article in Communications medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Giant Step in Personalized Medicine?Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Pre-trained Artificial Intelligence Models in the Prediction and Classification of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy: applications and perspectives.European heart journal · 2025Review
- Understanding Reasons for Oral Anticoagulation Nonprescription in Atrial Fibrillation Using Large Language Models.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Global disparities in drug-related adverse events of patients with multiple myeloma: a pharmacovigilance study.Blood cancer journal · 2024Article
- Obicetrapib-the Rebirth of CETP Inhibitors?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Health Inequities in Dietary Interventions on Atherosclerosis: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Is it Ready for Prime Time?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Applicability of Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Clinical Lipidology: A Narrative Review.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2024Review
- Patterns and gaps in guideline-directed statin use for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease by race and ethnicity.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in clinical workflow processes in vascular surgery and beyond.Seminars in vascular surgery · 2023Review
- Natural language processing to identify reasons for sex disparity in statin prescriptions.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2023Article
- Identifying Reasons for Statin Nonuse in Patients With Diabetes Using Deep Learning of Electronic Health Records.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Natural Language Processing Methods to Identify Oncology Patients at High Risk for Acute Care with Clinical Notes.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023Article
- Using deep learning-based natural language processing to identify reasons for statin nonuse in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.Communications medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Statins conclusively decrease mortality in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), the leading cause of death worldwide, and are strongly recommended by guidelines. However, real-world statin utilization and persistence are low, resulting in excess mortality. Identifying reasons for statin nonuse at scale across health systems is crucial to developing targeted interventions to improve statin use. Methods: We developed and validated deep learning-based natural language processing (NLP) approaches (Clinical Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers [BERT]) to classify statin nonuse and reasons for statin nonuse using unstructured electronic health records (EHRs) from a diverse healthcare system. Results: We present data from a cohort of 56,530 ASCVD patients, among whom 21,508 (38%) lack guideline-directed statin prescriptions and statins listed as allergies in structured EHR portions. Of these 21,508 patients without prescriptions, only 3,929 (18%) have any discussion of statin use or nonuse in EHR documentation. The NLP classifiers identify statin nonuse with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI 0.93-0.96) and reasons for nonuse with a weighted-average AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.86-0.91) when evaluated against manual expert chart review in a held-out test set. Clinical BERT identifies key patient-level reasons (side-effects, patient preference) and clinician-level reasons (guideline-discordant practices) for statin nonuse, including differences by type of ASCVD and patient race/ethnicity. Conclusions: Our deep learning NLP classifiers can identify crucial gaps in statin nonuse and reasons for nonuse in high-risk populations to support education, clinical decision support, and potential pathways for health systems to address ASCVD treatment gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.