Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35856024›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Toward deep observation: A systematic survey on artificial intelligence techniques to monitor fetus via ultrasound images.

Mahmood Alzubaidi, Marco Agus, Khalid Alyafei, Khaled A Althelaya, Uzair Shah, Alaa Abd-Alrazaq, Mohammed Anbar, Michel Makhlouf, Mowafa Househ

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. AI in Childbirth and Emerging Alternatives to Traditional Fertility Treatments.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. FetSAM: Advanced Segmentation Techniques for Fetal Head Biometrics in Ultrasound Imagery.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mahmood AlzubaidiCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Member of Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.
Marco AgusCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Member of Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.
Khalid AlyafeiWeil Cornell Medical College-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Khaled A AlthelayaCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Member of Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.
Uzair ShahCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Member of Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.
Alaa Abd-AlrazaqCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Member of Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.
Mohammed AnbarNational Advanced IPv6 Centre, University Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Michel MakhloufSidra Medical and Research Center, Member of Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.
Mowafa HousehCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Member of Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several reviews have been conducted regarding artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to improve pregnancy outcomes. But they are not focusing on ultrasound images. This survey aims to explore how AI can assist with fetal growth monitoring via ultrasound image. We reported our findings using the guidelines for PRISMA. We conducted a comprehensive search of eight bibliographic databases. Out of 1269 studies 107 are included. We found that 2D ultrasound images were more popular (88) than 3D and 4D ultrasound images (19). Classification is the most used method (42), followed by segmentation (31), classification integrated with segmentation (16) and other miscellaneous methods such as object-detection, regression, and reinforcement learning (18). The most common areas that gained traction within the pregnancy domain were the fetus head (43), fetus body (31), fetus heart (13), fetus abdomen (10), and the fetus face (10). This survey will promote the development of improved AI models for fetal clinical applications.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDiagnostic technique in health technologyHealth informaticsMedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID35856024
PMCPMC9287600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.