ArticleScientific African2022
Molecular modeling identification of potential drug candidates from selected African plants against SARS-CoV-2 key druggable proteins.
Article in Scientific African, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational discovery of emodin-based anthraquinones as PARP-1 inhibitors with relevance to ovarian and prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation studies of thiazole-coumarin and thiazole-triazole conjugates against MIn silico pharmacology · 2025Article
- Molecular Modeling Identification of Key Secondary Metabolites fromEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023Article
- Article
- A computational evaluation of structural stability of omicron and delta mutations of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins and human ACE-2 interactions.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is one of the major health threats the world has experienced. In order to stem the tide of the virus and its associated disease, rapid efforts have been dedicated to identifying credible anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs. This study forms part of the continuing efforts to develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 molecules and employed a computational structure-activity relationship approach with emphasis on 99 plant secondary metabolites from eight selected African medicinal plants with proven therapeutic benefits against respiratory diseases focusing on the viral protein targets [Spike protein (Sgp), Main protease (Mpro), and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)]. The results of the molecular dynamics simulation of the best docked compounds presented as binding free energy revealed that three compounds each against the Sgp (VBS, COG and ABA), and Mpro (COR, QOR and ABG) had higher and better affinity for the proteins than the respective reference drugs, cefoperazone (CSP) and Nelfinavir (NEF), while four compounds (HDG, VBS, COR and KOR) had higher and favorable binding affinity towards RdRp than the reference standard, ramdesivir (RDS). Analysis of interaction with the receptor binding domain amino acid residues of Sgp showed that VBS had the highest number of interactions (17) relative to 14 and 13 for COG and ABA, respectively. For Mpro, COR showed interactions with catalytic dyad residues (His172 and Cys145). Compared to RDS, COR, HDG, VBS and KOR formed 19, 18, 17 and 12 H-bond and Van der Waal bonds, respectively, with RdRp. Furthermore, structural examination of the three proteins after binding to the lead compounds revealed that the compounds formed stable complexes. These observations suggest that the identified compounds might be beneficial in the fight against COVID-19 and are suggested for further
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.