ArticleHeliyon2022
Implementation of a personal health planning program and health promotion in the community pharmacies.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is well known that one of the most accessible health providers are community pharmacists; hence, their role in sanitarian programs should not be neglected. Although they were not present in the first pilot trial of the Hungarian Health Planning Application (HHPA) made by the National Healthcare Services Center, they were involved in the latter phases of the personal health planning program. The aim was the detailed assessment of the HHPA, with regard to the newly introduced online form. The HHPA is a software designed to identify health risks and help in the health planning and management of the risks. The present study was started in the 2016/2017 academic year, and the enrollment of citizens was carried out by resident pharmacists, who had received additional training on the software and primary (and tertiary) prevention. The resident pharmacists also filled two opinion survey questionnaires, one at the beginning of the study and one after the study period. Seventy-five pharmacists enrolled 594 citizens. At the 190 participants who enrolled by online application, the drop-out rate was similar to the personal way. The main four risks that were identified in the study were the risk of an inactive lifestyle (47.8%), weight problems (38.7%), risk of diabetes mellitus (26.9%), and cardiovascular risks (25.3%). About the project, the majority of the pharmacists thought that it was a useful project. Highlighted supporting factors were colleges in the pharmacies that were very encouraging; however, factors such as long risk-assessment or the non-cooperation of the other healthcare providers were discouraging. The personal health planning program is a favorable initiative for identifying health risks and determining health plans. Furthermore, the used software seems to be same effective as personal way, but more suitable in the present pandemic situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.