Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35855948›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Proceedings2022

Structural analysis and simulation of solid microneedle array for vaccine delivery applications.

Chandbadshah S B V J, Giriraj Mannayee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Proceedings, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Recent progress of polymeric microneedle-assisted long-acting transdermal drug delivery.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chandbadshah S B V JSchool of Mechanical Engineering (SMEC), VIT University, Vellore 632014, India.
Giriraj MannayeeSchool of Mechanical Engineering (SMEC), VIT University, Vellore 632014, India.
Vellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper promotes a basic, quick, stature adaptable, and direct approach to selecting exceptionally suitable materials in polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) and silicon for microneedle fabrication. Researchers and scientists are facing challenges in readily selecting biocompatible materials for microneedle fabrication. Solid porous silicon and PEGDA microneedles are particularly biocompatible and desirable for vaccine delivery by the transdermal vaccine delivery method if microneedle arrays are fabricated successfully using lithography techniques as they belong to enhanced patient concurrence and well-being. Moreover, silicon and PEGDA microneedles are the ultimate for conveying coronavirus vaccines. In this work, we applied the ANSYS workbench tool to investigate the properties of triangular pyramidal-shaped solid silicon and PEGDA microneedle array to perform structural analysis on microneedle for estimating the capability of an array of needles to enter and convey vaccines along with the skin. These outcomes demonstrated that microneedles of porous silicon are better than polymers such as PEGDA as far as mechanical strength and capacity to convey drugs. Buckling was anticipated as the fundamental method to estimate the failure of microneedles and finally, by analysis, it was clear that buckling does not impact the potential of the silicon microneedle needle array. Silicon and PEGDA microneedles are penetrated against human skin surfaces in explicit dynamics by utilizing the ANSYS tool to select the best material. Along these lines, the current strategy can work with silicon and PEGDA microneedles for useful applications. The von Mises stresses generated by applying loads on silicon and PEGDA arrays were greater than the skin resistance of 3.18 MPa and suitable for skin insertion. Silicon microneedles are sustained due to buckling but PEGDA needles fail if the loading is more than 0.1 N. Vaccination can be provided to humans if needle arrays are fabricated based on this approach and design analysis and considering parameters.

Indexed as

AnalysisANSYSANSYS, Analysis of SystemsCAD, Computer Aided DesignCMC, Carboxymethyl celluloseDNA, Deoxyribonucleic acidFEA, Finite Element AnalysisFEMFEM, Finite element methodMicroneedlePEGDA, Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylateSiliconSimulationTB, TuberculosisTDDS, Transdermal Drug Delivery SystemsVaccine

Identifiers

PMID35855948
PMCPMC9277466
OpenAlexW4285097726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.