Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35855899›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Changes in the core species of the ant-plant network of oak forest converted to grassland: replacement of its ant functional groups.

Mariana Cuautle, Cecilia Díaz-Castelazo, Citlalli Castillo-Guevara, Carolina Guadalupe Torres Lagunes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mariana CuautleCiencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Puebla, México.
Cecilia Díaz-CastelazoRed de Interacciones Multitróficas, Instituto de Ecología, A. C., Xalapa, Veracruz, México.
Citlalli Castillo-GuevaraCentro de Investigación en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, San Felipe Ixtacuixtla, Tlaxcala, México.
Carolina Guadalupe Torres LagunesCiencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Puebla, México.
Universidad de las Américas Puebla · MXAutonomous University of Tlaxcala · MXInstituto de Ecología · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land-use change in terrestrial environments is one of the main threats to biodiversity. The study of ant-plant networks has increased our knowledge of the diversity of interactions and structure of these communities; however, little is known about how land-use change affects ant-plant networks. Here we determine whether the change in land use, from native oak forest to induced grassland, affected the network properties of ant-plant networks in a temperate forest in Mexico. We hypothesize that the disturbed vegetation will be more nested and generalized due to the addition of generalist species to the network. The oak forest network comprises 47 plant species and 11 ant species, while the induced grassland network has 35 and 13, respectively. Floral nectar was the resource used most intensely by the ants in both vegetation types. The ant-plant network of the induced grassland was significantly more nested and generalist than that of the oak forest; however, none of the networks were nested when considering the frequency of interaction. In both vegetation types, the ants were more specialized than the plants, and niche overlap was low. This could be related to the dominant species present in each type of vegetation:

Indexed as

AntsQuercusAnimalsForestsGrasslandPlantsAnt-plant interactionsLand-use changeMexicoNested network

Identifiers

PMID35855899
PMCPMC9288171
OpenAlexW4285088626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.