Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35855607›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Data rescue: saving environmental data from extinction.

Ellen K Bledsoe, Joseph B Burant, Gracielle T Higino, Dominique G Roche, Sandra A Binning, Kerri Finlay, Jason Pither, Laura S Pollock, Jennifer M Sunday, Diane S Srivastava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Data rescue: saving environmental data from extinction.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ellen K BledsoeThe Living Data Project, Canadian Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3629-7235
Joseph B BurantThe Living Data Project, Canadian Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0713-3100
Gracielle T HiginoThe Living Data Project, Canadian Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2791-8383
Dominique G RocheThe Living Data Project, Canadian Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3326-864X
Sandra A BinningThe Living Data Project, Canadian Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2804-9979
Kerri FinlayThe Living Data Project, Canadian Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6835-8832
Jason PitherThe Living Data Project, Canadian Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7490-6839
Laura S PollockThe Living Data Project, Canadian Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6004-4027
Jennifer M SundayThe Living Data Project, Canadian Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9372-040X
Diane S SrivastavaThe Living Data Project, Canadian Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4541-5595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historical and long-term environmental datasets are imperative to understanding how natural systems respond to our changing world. Although immensely valuable, these data are at risk of being lost unless actively curated and archived in data repositories. The practice of data rescue, which we define as identifying, preserving, and sharing valuable data and associated metadata at risk of loss, is an important means of ensuring the long-term viability and accessibility of such datasets. Improvements in policies and best practices around data management will hopefully limit future need for data rescue; these changes, however, do not apply retroactively. While rescuing data is not new, the term lacks formal definition, is often conflated with other terms (i.e. data reuse), and lacks general recommendations. Here, we outline seven key guidelines for effective rescue of historically collected and unmanaged datasets. We discuss prioritization of datasets to rescue, forming effective data rescue teams, preparing the data and associated metadata, and archiving and sharing the rescued materials. In an era of rapid environmental change, the best policy solutions will require evidence from both contemporary and historical sources. It is, therefore, imperative that we identify and preserve valuable, at-risk environmental data before they are lost to science.

Indexed as

data archivinghistorical datalong-term ecological dataopen sciencereproducibilitytransparency

Identifiers

PMID35855607
PMCPMC9297007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.