Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35855458›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2022

Corticosteroids use and neurocognitive functioning in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: Evidence from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 26101.

Ivan Caramanna, Julie M de Kort, Alba A Brandes, Walter Taal, Michael Platten, Ahmed Idbaih, Jean Sebastien Frenel, Wolfgang Wick, Chandrakanth Jayachandran Preetha, Martin Bendszus and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ivan CaramannaDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1520-499X
Julie M de KortDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alba A BrandesDepartment of Medical Oncology, AUSL, Bologna, Italia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2503-9089
Walter TaalDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5530-7259
Michael PlattenDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Ahmed IdbaihSorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, F-75013, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5290-1204
Jean Sebastien FrenelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest-Centre Rene Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France.
Wolfgang WickGerman Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6171-634X
Chandrakanth Jayachandran PreethaDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin BendszusDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp VollmuthDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jaap C ReijneveldDepartment of Neurology, Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, the Netherlands.
Martin KleinDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLHeidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In patients with recurrent glioblastoma, corticosteroids are frequently used to mitigate intracranial pressure and to improve patient neurological functioning. To date, in these patients, no systematic studies have been performed to assess neurocognitive functioning (NCF) in relation to corticosteroid treatment. Methods: Using baseline data (ie, prior to randomization) of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 26101, we performed regression analysis to assess the predictive value of corticosteroid intake on performance of the EORTC brain tumor clinical trial NCF test battery. The battery is comprised of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWA), and Trail Making Test (A and B). Results: Out of 321 patients, 148 (46.1%) were not using corticosteroids, and 173 were using dexamethasone (34.3%), methylprednisolone (9.7%), or other corticosteroids (9.9%). Patients on corticosteroids had worse performance on all neurocognitive tests. Regression analyses demonstrated a negative association between corticosteroids use and the HVLT-R free recall score ( Conclusions: Glioblastoma patients prescribed with corticosteroids show poorer memory functions, expressive language, visual-motor scanning speed, and executive functioning than patients not using corticosteroids. Furthermore, we found a negative association between corticosteroid intake and memory functions. The possibility of deleterious effects of corticosteroids on NCF should be considered during clinical decision making.

Indexed as

corticosteroidsglioblastomamemoryneurocognitive functioningneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID35855458
PMCPMC9290884
OpenAlexW4220757500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.