Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35855456›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2022

The Aftercare Survey: Assessment and intervention practices after brain tumor surgery in Europe.

Joanna Sierpowska, Adrià Rofes, Kristoffer Dahlslätt, Emmanuel Mandonnet, Mark Ter Laan, Monika Połczyńska, Philip De Witt Hamer, Matej Halaj, Giannantonio Spena, Torstein R Meling and 24 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 20 institutions in 14 countries.

Joanna SierpowskaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5991-6916
Adrià RofesDepartment of Neurolinguistics, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Kristoffer Dahlslätt
Emmanuel MandonnetNeurosurgery Department, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
Mark Ter LaanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud Institute of Health Science, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9213-430X
Monika PołczyńskaDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Philip De Witt HamerMedical Department, Amsterdam University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Matej HalajDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Giannantonio SpenaNeurosurgery Department, Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy.
Torstein R MelingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kazuya MotomuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4376-1104
Andrés Felipe ReyesExperimental Psychology Lab, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
Alexandre Rainha CamposDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pierre A RobeDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Luca ZigiottoDepartment of Neurosurgery, "S. Chiara" Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
Silvio SarubboDepartment of Neurosurgery, "S. Chiara" Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.
Christian F FreyschlagDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Martijn P G BroenDepartment of Neurology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
George StranjalisDepartment of Neurosurgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos PapadopoulosDepartment of Neurosurgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Evangelia LioutaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Geert-Jan RuttenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Catarina Pessanha ViegasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana SilvestreDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Lisbon, Portugal.
Federico PerroteDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Private University Hospital of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Natacha BrocheroDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Private University Hospital of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Cynthia CáceresDepartment of Neurosciences, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.
Agata Zdun-RyżewskaDepartment of Quality-of-Life Research, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Wojciech KlocDepartment of Psychology and Sociology of Health and Public Health School of Public Health Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia-Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland.
Djaina SatoerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Olga DragoyCenter for Language and Brain, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.
Marc P H HendriksAcademic Centre for Epileptology, Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, the Netherlands.
Juan C Alvarez-CarrilesClinical Neuropsychology Unit, Liaison Mental Health Service, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Vitória PiaiDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRRadboud University Nijmegen · NLHospital Garcia de Orta · PTProvincia Autonoma di Trento · ITUniversity of Groningen · NLAlessandro Manzoni Hospital · ITElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC · NLGdańsk Medical University · PLHôpital Lariboisière · FRHospital de Santa Maria · PTHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESInnsbruck Medical University · ATMaastricht University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLNagoya University · JPNational Research University Higher School of Economics · RUUniversidad de Oviedo · ESUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity Hospital Olomouc · CZ

Funding

Comprehensive pre-surgical identification of the critical language network in tumor patientsK01DC016904 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI POLCZYNSKA, MONIKA MARIA · 2018 to 2023
$853k
NIDCD NIH HHS K01 DC016904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with gliomas need specialized neurosurgical, neuro-oncological, psycho-oncological, and neuropsychological care. The role of language and cognitive recovery and rehabilitation in patients' well-being and resumption of work is crucial, but there are no clear guidelines for the ideal timing and character of assessments and interventions. The goal of the present work was to describe representative (neuro)psychological practices implemented after brain surgery in Europe. Methods: An online survey was addressed to professionals working with individuals after brain surgery. We inquired about the assessments and interventions and the involvement of caregivers. Additionally, we asked about recommendations for an ideal assessment and intervention plan. Results: Thirty-eight European centers completed the survey. Thirty of them offered at least one postsurgical (neuro)psychological assessment, mainly for language and cognition, especially during the early recovery stage and at long term. Twenty-eight of the participating centers offered postsurgical therapies. Patients who stand the highest chances of being included in evaluation and therapy postsurgically are those who underwent awake brain surgery, harbored a low-grade glioma, or showed poor recovery. Nearly half of the respondents offer support programs to caregivers, and all teams recommend them. Treatments differed between those offered to individuals with low-grade glioma vs those with high-grade glioma. The figure of caregiver is not yet fully recognized in the recovery phase. Conclusion: We stress the need for more complete rehabilitation plans, including the emotional and health-related aspects of recovery. In respondents' opinions, assessment and rehabilitation plans should also be individually tailored and goal-directed (eg, professional reinsertion).

Indexed as

caregiversglioma aftercarepostsurgical outcomesquality of lifesurvey

Identifiers

PMID35855456
PMCPMC9290892
OpenAlexW4226237110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.