Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35855307›Full record

ArticleTechnology in society2022

Impact of COVID-19 food supply chain: Comparing the use of IoT in three South African supermarkets.

Linda Njomane, Arnesh Telukdarie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unspoken Consequences of Structural Racism in the USA: Diabetes and COVID-19.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Linda NjomaneUniversity of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 24, Auckland Park, 2006, South Africa.
Arnesh TelukdarieUniversity of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 24, Auckland Park, 2006, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic by comparing the performance of three major supermarkets in South Africa and addressing the following questions. 1) What is the impact of a supply chain disruption on the food system? 2) What interventions (short and long-term) are taken by the food supply chain to mitigate disruption? 3) What does the post-pandemic picture look like for the food retail sector? This study adopts a comparative research approach and investigates direct strategies adopted by various food supply chain actors to mitigate the impact of covid-19. This study compares how retailers Checkers, Woolworths, and Pick n Pay have adapted their business models to remain resilient during COVID-19 lockdown. The results show that the food supply chain remained resilient even with demand management challenges at the lockdown. Food supply chain issues came under a spotlight as borders and production plants were shut down or restricted to contain the spread of the virus. This study establishes that the food shortage is primarily caused by panic buying at the beginning of lockdown, causing shock in the supply chain cadence. The other aspect of food security issue is attributed to food availability and socioeconomic problems resulting from loss of income. On sustainability, there are fears that control measures such as packaging (increased use of plastic), cleaning chemicals, waste and sanitisation of space to maintain hygiene as required for covid-19 can undermine the gains towards preserving the environment.

Indexed as

COVID-19 regulationsFood supply chain resilienceIoTOn-demand shopping

Identifiers

PMID35855307
PMCPMC9281459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.