ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2021
Sinking skin flap syndrome in a patient with bone resorption after cranioplasty and ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sunken flap following chest tube placement in the presence of ventriculopleural shunt: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2024Article
- Explanted Skull Flaps after Decompressive Hemicraniectomy Demonstrate Relevant Bone Avitality-Is Their Reimplantation Worth the Risk?Brain sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSinking skin flap syndrome (SSFS) is an uncommon complication that can follow decompressive craniectomy. Even less common is the development of SSFS following bone resorption after cranioplasty with exacerbation by a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. OBSERVATIONS: A 56-year-old male sustained a severe traumatic brain injury and subsequently underwent an emergent decompressive craniectomy. After craniectomy, a cranioplasty was performed, and a VP shunt was placed. The patient returned to the emergency department 5 years later with left-sided hemiplegia and seizures. His clinical presentation was attributed to complete bone flap resorption (BFR) complicated by SSFS likely exacerbated by his VP shunt and the resultant mass effect on the underlying brain parenchyma. The patient underwent surgical intervention via synthetic bone flap replacement. Within 6 days, he recovered to his baseline neurological status. LESSONS: SSFS after complete BFR is a rare complication following cranioplasty. To the authors' knowledge, having a VP shunt in situ to exacerbate the clinical picture has yet to be reported in the literature. In addition to presenting the case, the authors also describe an effective treatment strategy of decompressing the brain and elevating the scalp flap while addressing the redundant tissue, then using a synthetic mesh to reconstruct the calvarial defect while keeping the shunt in situ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.