ReviewCureus2022
Adherence to Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Depressive symptoms after surgical and medical management of OSA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Pooled it
- GLP-1/GIP dual agonist tirzepatide in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: mechanisms, evidence, and clinical perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Comparative Study on CPAP Compliance: PAP-NAP Followed by CPAP Trial vs. CPAP Trial Alone.Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2025Article
- Long-Term Management of Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome: Efficacy and Challenges of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy-A Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Air pollution, weather and positive airway pressure treatment adherence in adults with sleep apnea: a retrospective community-based repeated-measures longitudinal study.Journal of sleep research · 2024Article
- Effect of particulate matter on continuous positive airway pressure adherence in obstructive sleep apnea patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Exploring the Impact of Positional Sleep Apnea in a Turkish Population: Unveiling the Untold Story.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adherence to either continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) represents a real challenge to sleep medicine physicians. Many risk factors/predictors for nonadherence exist, and usually, it is multifactorial. Long-term nonadherence with CPAP therapy has been associated with the use of CPAP for <4 hours/night during early treatment, moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), poor self-efficacy, and unsupportive bed partner. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) recommends follow-up of patients with OSA within the first two weeks of CPAP use to optimize adherence. Measures to improve adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy go through an integrated approach that involves behavioral therapy and prompt management of side effects. Pharmacologic therapy in the form of a sedative-hypnotic sleep aid has a minor role in managing nonadherence to CPAP based on the greater risk of side effects. This article will briefly discuss the risk factors and management of nonadherence to PAP therapy in patients with OSAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.