Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35855198›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2022

The Senologic International Society Survey on Ductal Carcinoma

Carole Mathelin, Massimo Lodi, Khalid Alghamdi, Bolivar Arboleda-Osorio, Eli Avisar, Stanley Anyanwu, Mohcen Boubnider, Mauricio Maghales Costa, Elisabeth Elder, Tony Elonge and 15 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 19 institutions in 19 countries.

Carole MathelinInstitut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67033 Cedex, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7680-0210
Massimo LodiInstitut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67033 Cedex, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7593-6378
Khalid AlghamdiInstitut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67033 Cedex, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5548-0852
Bolivar Arboleda-OsorioHIMA San Pablo Hospital, Porto Rico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8789-0824
Eli AvisarMiller Scholl of Medicine, University of Miami, Florida, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0771-464X
Stanley AnyanwuNnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7081-4462
Mohcen BoubniderCentre Pierre et Marie Curie, Algiers, Algeria.
Mauricio Maghales CostaAmericas Centro de Oncologia Integrada, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8094-5511
Elisabeth ElderWestmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-9898
Tony ElongeOtema Hospital, Lodja, Congo Democratic Republic.
Luiz GebrimPerola Byington Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-9191
Xishan HaoTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Shigeru ImotoKyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0878-7851
Esther MekaYaoundé University, Yaoundé, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5187-4707
Michel MouelleInstitut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67033 Cedex, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/
Alexander MundingerFranziskus Hospital; Niels-Stensen-Kliniken, Georgsmarienhütte, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4111-0906
Valerijus OstapenkoNational Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8930-311X
Serdar ÖzbaşTurkish Federation of Breast Disease Societies, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8019-8015
Tolga ÖzmenMiller Scholl of Medicine, University of Miami, Florida, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7136-6195
Vahit ÖzmenIstanbul Florence Nightingale Breast Center, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2973-8247
Tadeusz PienkowskiPostgraduate Medical Education Center, Warszaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0110-5950
Gustavo SarriaInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru.
Ashraf SelimFaculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7738-3888
Vladimir SemiglazovN. N. Petrov Cancer Research Centre, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Schlomo SchneebaumSourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7560-5635
Institut de génétique et de biologie moléculaire et cellulaire · FRUniversity of Miami · USCairo University · EGCentre de Recherche Nucléaire d’Alger · DZHospital da Mulher São Paulo · BRInstitut de Cancérologie Strasbourg · FRInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas · PEIstanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital · TRKing Abdulaziz University · SAKinshasa General Hospital · CDKyorin University Hospital · JPNational Cancer Institute · LTNnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital · NGPostgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PLSt. Franziskus Hospital · DETel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · ILTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNUniversité de Yaoundé I · CMWestmead Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Therapeutic management of ductal carcinoma Materials and Methods: The Senologic International Society network members participated to an online survey using a questionnaire, between November 2021 and February 2022. Results: Twenty-two responses from 20 different countries showed that organized breast cancer screening programs were present for 87% participants, and DCIS cases represented 13.7% of all breast cancers. Most participants used the grade classification (100%), the morphological classification (78%) and performed immunohistochemistry assays (73%). In case of conservative treatment, the mean re-excision rate was 10.3% and clear margins of mean 2.5 mm were considered healthy. Radical mastectomy rate was 35.5% with a breast reconstruction rate of 53%. Tumor bed boost indications were heterogeneous, and 73% of participants indicated hormone therapy for hormone-positive DCIS. Surgery and radiotherapy omission for some low-risk DCIS were considered by 73% of participants. Multigene assays were used by 43% of participants. Concerning future changes in DCIS management, participants mostly answered surgical de-escalation (48%), radiotherapy de-escalation (35) and/or active surveillance for some cases (22%). Conclusion: This survey provided an overview of the current practices of DCIS management worldwide. It showed that some areas are rather consensual: incidence increases over time, treatment in young women, pathological classifications, definition of healthy margins, the skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. However, some topics are still debated and result in heterogeneous practices, such as evolution in the age of diagnosis, the benefit of de-escalation in low-risk DCIS among elderly women, indications for hormone therapy, radiotherapy omission, or multigene assays. Further evidence is needed to reach consensus on these points, and innovative approaches are still under evaluation in clinical trials. The International Senologic Society, by its members, encourages precision medicine and personalized treatments for DCIS, to avoid overtreatment and overdiagnosis, and provide better healthcare to women with DCIS.

Indexed as

clinical practicesDuctal carcinoma in situinnovative approachesprecision medicinesurveytreatment de-escalation

Identifiers

PMID35855198
PMCPMC9255660
OpenAlexW4283758946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.