Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35855191›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2022

The Factors for Success and Lack of Success in the Breast Cancer Patient Care Pathway: A Qualitative Study From the Health Care Staff Perspective.

Eija Metsälä, Tanja Schroderus-Salo, Kjersti Straume, Bergliot Strom, Laurent Marmy, Mona Øynes, José A Pires Jorge, Liis Randle, Siret Kivistik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Exploring the gastric cancer care pathway in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eija MetsäläDepartment of Rehabilitation and Examination, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Vantaa, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4282-0798
Tanja Schroderus-SaloDepartment of Radiography and Radiotherapy, Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5514-7622
Kjersti StraumeDepartment of Cancer Treatment and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5631-8016
Bergliot StromFaculty of Health and Social Science, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/
Laurent MarmyDepartment of Radiography and Radiotherapy, School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Delémont, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/
Mona ØynesFaculty of Health and Social Science, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3374-3380
José A Pires JorgeDepartment of Radiography and Radiotherapy, School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Delémont, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/
Liis RandleDepartment of Haematology and Oncology, Clinic Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/
Siret KivistikDepartment of Radiography and Biomedical Laboratory Science Tartu Healthcare College, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To produce information about factors related to successful and unsuccessful breast cancer care pathways from the health care staff perspective. Materials and Methods: An electronic qualitative survey was used to collect data simultaneously from hospitals located in four different countries, focusing on four professional groups: diagnostic radiographers; radiation therapists; breast cancer nurses; and biomedical laboratory scientists (n = 23). The hospitals participating in the study treat breast cancer patients and research permits were applied from all of them. Data was analysed by deductive thematic analysis. Results: At the core of a successful breast cancer care pathway is the right content and timely information provided to the patient at the pace the patient is able to adopt. This is especially highlighted at the beginning of the treatment process. In regards to diagnostic services, rigorous execution of mammography, sampling techniques and analyses were seen as important. Staff also valued the importance of aftercare and follow-up, and highlighted the fact that the patient should be given a chance to keep in close contact with care and treatment staff, even after their active treatment process has finished. Conclusion: Health care staff recognized the same success factors for optimal breast cancer care and treatment pathways as patients reported in previous studies, yet more emphasis was put on patient characteristics and the technical performance features of the process. Both patient and staff viewpoints should be taken into account in planning breast cancer care pathways.

Indexed as

Breast cancercare pathwaystaff viewpointsuccess factors

Identifiers

PMID35855191
PMCPMC9255659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.