ArticleSurgical neurology international2022
Acute progression of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation diagnosed by biopsy in an elderly patient: A case report.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy-Related Inflammation: A Single-Center Experience and a Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation (CAA-I) presents with slowly progressive nonspecific neurological symptoms, such as headache, cognitive function disorder, and seizures. Pathologically, the deposition of amyloid-β proteins at the cortical vascular wall is a characteristic and definitive finding. Differential diagnoses include infectious encephalitis, neurosarcoidosis, primary central nervous system lymphoma, and glioma. Here, we report a case of CAA-I showing acute progression, suggesting a glioma without enhancement, in which a radiological diagnosis was difficult using standard magnetic resonance imaging. Case Description: An 80-year-old woman was admitted due to transient abnormal behavior. Her initial imaging findings were similar to those of a glioma. She presented with rapid progression of the left hemiplegia and disturbance of consciousness for 6 days after admission and underwent emergent biopsy with a targeted small craniotomy under general anesthesia despite her old age. Intraoperative macroscopic findings followed by a pathological study revealed CAA-I as the definitive diagnosis. Steroid pulse therapy with methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisolone markedly improved both the clinical symptoms and imaging findings. Conclusion: Differential diagnosis between CAA-I and nonenhancing gliomas may be difficult using standard imaging studies in cases presenting with acute progression. A pathological diagnosis under minimally invasive small craniotomy may be an option, even for elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.