Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35855057›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2021

Total resection of presacral giant schwannoma via minimally invasive dorsal approach: illustrative case.

Guenther C Feigl, Domagoj Jugovic, Daniel Staribacher, Rolf Buslei, Dzmitry Kuzmin

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Presentation and surgical management approaches of giant presacral and sacral schwannomas: a case report and systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Optic nerve sheath schwannoma: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guenther C FeiglDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Domagoj JugovicDepartments of Neurosurgery and.
Daniel StaribacherDepartments of Neurosurgery and.
Rolf BusleiPathology and Neuropathology, General Hospital Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany; and.
Dzmitry KuzminDepartments of Neurosurgery and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiant presacral schwannomas are extremely rare in neurosurgery. There are various approaches to the surgical treatment of symptomatic giant presacral schwannomas. The least traumatic is the one-stage surgery with a dorsal approach. OBSERVATIONS: The authors describe a case of a 52-year-old male with pain in the sacral region and partial urinary dysfunction. A total tumor resection through a minimally invasive dorsal approach was performed, and anatomical and functional preservation of all sacral nerves with no postoperative complications was achieved. LESSONS: The authors have shown the possibility of total tumor resection with a minimally invasive dorsal approach without the development of intra- and postoperative complications. Operative corridors that have been created by a tumor can be used and expanded for a minimally invasive dorsal approach to facilitate resection and minimize tissue disruption.

Indexed as

CT = computed tomographydorsal approachminimally invasive approachMRI = magnetic resonance imagingpresacral giant schwannoma

Identifiers

PMID35855057
PMCPMC9265199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.