Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35855027›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2022

National inventory of authorized diagnostic imaging equipment in Ghana: data as of September 2020.

Bright Kwadwo Bour, Edem Kwabla Sosu, Francis Hasford, Prince Kwabena Gyekye, Daniel Gyingiri Achel, Augustine Faanu, Joseph Kwabena Amoako, Richard Denys Pitcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An audit of licenced radiological equipment and personnel in Botswana.Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bright Kwadwo BourSchool of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Edem Kwabla SosuSchool of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Francis HasfordSchool of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Prince Kwabena GyekyeSchool of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Daniel Gyingiri AchelSchool of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Augustine FaanuSchool of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Joseph Kwabena AmoakoSchool of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Richard Denys PitcherDivision of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: to address the challenge of inadequate and non-equitable distribution of diagnostic imaging equipment, countries are encouraged to evaluate the distribution of installed systems and undertake adequate monitoring to ensure equitability. Ghana´s medical imaging resources have been analyzed in this study and evaluated against the status in other countries. Methods: data on registered medical imaging equipment were retrieved from the database of the Nuclear Regulatory Authority and analyzed. The equipment/population ratio was mapped out graphically for the 16 regions of Ghana. Comparison of the equipment/population ratio was made with the situation in other countries. Results: six hundred and seventy-four diagnostic imaging equipment units from 266 medical imaging facilities (2.5 units/facility), comprising computed tomography (CT), general X-ray, dental X-ray, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) gamma camera, fluoroscopy, mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were surveyed nationally. None of the imaging systems measured above the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) average imaging units per million populations (u/mp). The overall equipment/population ratio estimated nationally was 21.4 u/mp. Majority of the imaging systems were general X-ray, installed in the Greater Accra and Ashanti regions. The regional estimates of equipment/population ratios were Greater Accra (49.6 u/mp), Ashanti (22.4 u/mp), Western (21.4 u/mp), Eastern (20.6 u/mp), Bono East (20.0 u/mp), Bono (19.2 u/mp), Volta (17.9 u/mp), Upper West (16.7 u/mp), Oti (12.5 u/mp), Central (11.9 u/mp), Northern (8.9 u/mp), Ahafo (8.9 u/mp), Upper East (6.9 u/mp), Western North (6.7 u/mp), Savannah (5.5 u/mp) and North-East (1.7 u/mp). Conclusion: medical imaging equipment shortfall exist across all imaging modalities in Ghana. A wide inter-regional disparity in the distribution of medical imaging equipment exists contrary to WHO´s recommendation for equitable distribution. A concerted national plan will be needed to address the disparity.

Indexed as

Diagnostic EquipmentDiagnostic ImagingHealthcare DisparitiesHealth EquityHealth FacilitiesFluoroscopyGhanaHumansMammographyRadiographyDiagnostic radiologyequipmentGhanamedical imagingpopulation ratio

Identifiers

PMID35855027
PMCPMC9250666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.