Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35855004›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

The Politicization of Ivermectin Tweets During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Marlon I Diaz, John J Hanna, Amy E Hughes, Christoph U Lehmann, Richard J Medford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A National Discussion of COVID-19 on Twitter.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lessons Learned from Ivermectin.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marlon I DiazClinical Informatics Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1870-2663
John J HannaClinical Informatics Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Amy E HughesDepartment of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Christoph U LehmannClinical Informatics Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9559-4646
Richard J MedfordClinical Informatics Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9814-8043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We explore the ivermectin discourse and sentiment in the United States with a special focus on political leaning through the social media blogging site Twitter. Methods: We used sentiment analysis and topic modeling to geospatially explore ivermectin Twitter discourse in the United States and compared it to the political leaning of a state based on the 2020 presidential election. Results: All modeled topics were associated with a negative sentiment. Tweets originating from democratic leaning states were more likely to be negative. Conclusions: Real-time analysis of social media content can identify public health concerns and guide timely public health interventions tackling disinformation.

Indexed as

disinformationivermectinpublic opinionsocial mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID35855004
PMCPMC9290534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.