Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35855002›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Testing for Cryptococcosis at a Major Commercial Laboratory-United States, 2019-2021.

Kaitlin Benedict, Jeremy A W Gold, Stephanie Dietz, Seher Anjum, Peter R Williamson, Brendan R Jackson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kaitlin BenedictMycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0458-2493
Jeremy A W GoldMycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Stephanie DietzDivision of Health Informatics and Surveillance, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Seher AnjumLaboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Immunology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Peter R WilliamsonLaboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Immunology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Brendan R JacksonMycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Molecular Pathobiology of Cryptococcus neoformansZIAAI001123 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI WILLIAMSON, PETER · 2010 to 2025
$10.4M
Translational Research: Host-Pathogen Interactions in Patient Fungal DiseasesZIAAI001124 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI WILLIAMSON, PETER · 2010 to 2025
$8.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cryptococcosis is a serious opportunistic fungal disease, and the proportion of cases among patients with immunosuppressive conditions other than HIV or organ transplant has increased. Understanding laboratory testing patterns for cryptococcosis is useful for estimating its true burden and developing testing guidance. Methods: We identified cryptococcosis tests (cryptococcal antigen [CrAg], cryptococcal antibody, and fungal cultures) performed at a major national commercial laboratory ordered during March 1, 2019-October 1, 2021, and analyzed test results, patient and provider features, reasons for testing, geography, and temporal trends. Results: Among 29 180 serum CrAg tests, 4422 (15.2%) were positive, and among 10 724 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) CrAg tests, 492 (4.6%) were positive. Frequent reasons for serum CrAg testing in nonhospital settings (10 882 tests) were HIV (44.6%) and cryptococcosis (17.0%); other underlying conditions were uncommonly listed (<10% total). Serum CrAg positivity declined from 25.6% in October 2019 to 11.3% in September 2021. The South had the highest positivity for serum CrAg tests (16.6%), CSF CrAg tests (4.7%), and fungal cultures (0.15%). Among 5009 cryptococcal antibody tests, 5 (0.1%) were positive. Conclusions: Few outpatient serum CrAg tests were performed for patients with immunocompromising conditions other than HIV, suggesting potential missed opportunities for early detection. Given the high positive predictive value of CrAg testing, research is needed to improve early diagnosis, particularly in patients without HIV. Conversely, the low yield of antibody testing suggests that it may be of low value. The decline in CrAg positivity during the COVID-19 pandemic warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

antigenscryptococcosisCryptococcusfungallaboratoriesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35855002
PMCPMC9280322
OpenAlexW4280647467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.