Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35854970›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2022

Assessing a pilot co-operative-based workshop-subsidy model toward improving small-scale chicken production in peri-urban Nepal.

Sarai Acosta, Ruby Chen, Sunita Nhemaphuki, Damber Khanal, Myrna Cadena, Maurice Pitesky, Nancy Erbstein, Deb Niemeier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarai AcostaDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Ruby ChenDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, MD 20742, USA.
Sunita NhemaphukiR&D Innovative Solutions, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Damber KhanalR&D Innovative Solutions, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Myrna CadenaDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Maurice PiteskyDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Nancy ErbsteinSchool of Education, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Deb NiemeierDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, MD 20742, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Farmers in Nepal face many of the same global challenges associated with initiating and scaling poultry husbandry as many other developing countries. These include access to innovative approaches in finance, credit, coop design, marketing, and sales. As with most low-income countries, Nepalese poultry farmers also lack adequate training in poultry husbandry including biosecurity. In this paper, we describe a collaborative workshop-subsidy approach to addressing these challenges conducted by a partnership with the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, the College of Engineering, the School of Education, and a farming co-operative based in the semi-rural area of Bhaktapur, Nepal. The program included two workshops covering aspects of poultry rearing including coop construction, chick rearing, biosecurity, and husbandry. Both workshops were a combination of lectures and hands-on learning. Following completion of the workshops, each farmer received subsidized materials for coop construction and poultry rearing. The co-operative provided training facilities and a market for selling eggs. Despite an outbreak of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI), which affected the scale of program implementation, our results suggest that the workshop subsidy collaborative approach can be successful in reducing market entry barriers. Our 6-mo post-workshop survey showed that two-thirds of the workshop participants ultimately built their own coop and raised chicks. Half of these participants reported market available egg production and a doubling of egg consumption at home.

Indexed as

coop designNepalsmall-scale poultrywork-shop subsidy model

Identifiers

PMID35854970
PMCPMC9278829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.