ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Classification Algorithms for Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Images of Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease and Depression.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was aimed to explore the relationship between depression and brain function in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) complicated with depression based on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image classification algorithms. 30 people in the healthy control group and 70 people in the observation group were selected as the research objects. First, the preprocessing algorithms were applied on MRI images. With the depression classification algorithm based on deep learning, the features were extracted from the capsule network to construct a classification network, and the network structure was compared to obtain the difference in the distribution of brain lesions. Different classifiers and degree centrality, functional connection, low-frequency amplitude ratio, and low-frequency amplitude were selected to analyze the effectiveness of features. In the deep learning method, the neural network model was constructed, and feature extraction and classification network were carried out. The classification layer was based on the capsule network. The results showed that the correct rate of the deep learning feature extraction network structure combined with the capsule network classification was 82.47%, the recall rate was 83.69%, and the accuracy was 88.79%, showing that the capsule network can improve the heterogeneity of depression. The combination of fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF), DC, and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) can achieve the accuracy of 100%. In summary, MRI images showed that patients with depression may have neurological abnormalities in the white matter area. In this study, the classification algorithm based on brain MRI images can effectively improve the classification performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.