ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Clinical Observation of Flapless Implantation in the Posterior Tooth Area under the Guidance of the Fully Guided Template.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retracted: Clinical Observation of Flapless Implantation in the Posterior Tooth Area under the Guidance of the Fully Guided Template.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Analysis of Flapless and Conventional Flap Technique in Dental Implant Surgery - A Comparative Study.Annals of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-12Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/96C444F03B4EFA963B1EDCE5FEB33C
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Compared with the conventional flap implantation, the postoperative effect of flapless implantation of a single posterior tooth under the guidance of the fully guided template was observed. Materials and Methods: 67 cases were divided into the template group ( Results: Whether in buccolingual or mesiodistal directions, the maximum values of neck deviation, apical deviation, and depth deviation were less than 2 mm. The axial angle deviation was 0.07°∼5.93° in the buccolingual direction and 0°∼4.12° in the mesiodistal direction. The guiding effect of the template was relatively reliable, and the implantation site and depth were well controlled. Although there were small deviations, the accuracy of the template could meet the clinical needs. The operation time and the VAS (visual analogue scale) score 24 hours after the operation in the template group were lower than those in the flap group ( Conclusion: Compared with the conventional flap implantation, the flapless implantation in the posterior tooth area under the guidance of the fully guided template could improve the accuracy of the operation, shorten the operation time, and reduce the degree of postoperative pain and swelling, which had a certain positive clinical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.