Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35854677›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2022

Blowing the whistle during the first wave of COVID-19: A case study of Quebec nurses.

Marilou Gagnon, Amélie Perron, Caroline Dufour, Emily Marcogliese, Pierre Pariseau-Legault, David Kenneth Wright, Patrick Martin, Franco A Carnevale

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. To Our Nurse Friends: An Ode to Resistance.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2025
    Article
  4. Psychosocial Risks among Quebec Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Social Media Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Marilou GagnonSchool of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4214-3088
Amélie PerronSchool of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Caroline DufourSchool of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Emily MarcoglieseSchool of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Pierre Pariseau-LegaultDepartment of Nursing, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Canada.
David Kenneth WrightPalliative Care and Nursing Ethics, Centre for Research on Health and Nursing, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8130-656X
Patrick MartinFaculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Franco A CarnevaleIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Victoria · CACanadian Hospice Palliative Care Association · CAMcGill University · CAUniversité du Québec en Outaouais · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council 435-2019-1249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The experiences of nurses who blew the whistle during the COVID-19 pandemic have exposed gaps and revealed an urgent need to revisit our understanding of whistleblowing.

aimThe aim was to develop a better understanding of whistleblowing during a pandemic by using the experiences and lessons learned of Quebec nurses who blew the whistle during the first wave of COVID-19 as a case study. More specifically, to explore why and how nurses blew the whistle, what types of wrongdoing triggered their decision to do so and how context shaped the whistleblowing process as well as its consequences (including perceived consequences).

designThe study followed a single-case study design with three embedded units of analysis.

methodsWe used content analysis to analyse 83 news stories and 597 forms posted on a whistleblowing online platform. We also conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with nurses and analysed this data using a thematic analysis approach. Finally, we triangulated the findings.

resultsWe identified five themes across the case study. (1) During the first wave of COVID-19, Quebec nurses experienced a shifting sense of loyalty and relationship to workplace culture. (2) They witnessed exceedingly high numbers of intersecting wrongdoings amplified by mismanagement and long-standing issues. (3) They reported a lack of trust and transparency; thus, a need for external whistleblowing. (4) They used whistleblowing to reclaim their rights (notably, the right to speak) and build collective solidarity. (5) Finally, they saw whistleblowing as an act of moral courage in the face of a system in crisis. Together, these themes elucidate why and how nurse whistleblowing is different in pandemic times.

conclusionOur findings offer a more nuanced understanding of nurse whistleblowing and address important gaps in knowledge. They also highlight the need to rethink external whistleblowing, develop whistleblowing tools and advocate for whistleblowing protection. IMPACT: In many ways, the COVID-19 pandemic has challenged our foundational understanding of whistleblowing and, as a result, it has limited the usefulness of existing literature on the topic for reasons that will be brought to light in this paper. We believe that studying the uniqueness of whistleblowing during a pandemic can address this gap by describing why and how health care workers blow the whistle during a pandemic and situating this experience within a broader social, political, organizational context.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesHumansPandemicsQuebecWhistleblowingWorkplacecase studyCOVID-19ethicsnursespandemicqualitativeQuebecwhistleblowerwhistleblowing

Identifiers

PMID35854677
PMCPMC9349867
OpenAlexW4286213811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.