Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35854422›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the National Cancer Institute2022

Systemic or Vaginal Hormone Therapy After Early Breast Cancer: A Danish Observational Cohort Study.

Søren Cold, Frederik Cold, Maj-Britt Jensen, Deirdre Cronin-Fenton, Peer Christiansen, Bent Ejlertsen

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vaginal estrogen therapy for treatment of menopausal genitourinary syndrome among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Management of menopausal symptoms following treatment for hormone receptor positive breast cancer.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  14. Addressing the Needs of Breast Cancer Survivors.Current oncology reports · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Genitourinary symptoms in women with breast cancer: frequency, severity and impact.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Søren ColdDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4592-6531
Frederik ColdDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2085-8496
Maj-Britt JensenDanish Breast Cancer Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5348-3040
Deirdre Cronin-FentonDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9738-2284
Peer ChristiansenDepartment of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2748-9240
Bent EjlertsenDanish Breast Cancer Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8761-714X
Aarhus University Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen treated for breast cancer (BC) often suffer genitourinary syndrome of menopause. These symptoms may be alleviated by vaginal estrogen therapy (VET) or menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). However, there are concerns of risks of recurrence of BC and death following treatment.

methodsOur study included longitudinal data from a national cohort of postmenopausal women, diagnosed 1997-2004 with early-stage invasive estrogen receptor-positive nonmetastatic BC, who received no treatment or 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. We ascertained prescription data on hormone therapy, VET or MHT, from a national prescription registry. We evaluated mortality and risk of recurrence associated with use of VET and MHT vs non-use using multivariable models adjusted for potential confounders.

resultsAmong 8461 women who had not received VET or MHT before BC diagnosis, 1957 and 133 used VET and MHT, respectively, after diagnosis. Median follow-up was 9.8 years for recurrence and 15.2 years for mortality. The adjusted relative risk of recurrence was 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89 to 1.32) for VET (1.39 [95% CI = 1.04 to 1.85 in the subgroup receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors]) and 1.05 (95% CI = 0.62 to 1.78) for MHT. The adjusted hazard ratios for overall mortality were 0.78 (95% CI = 0.71 to 0.87) and 0.94 (95% CI = 0.70 to 1.26) for VET and MHT, respectively.

conclusionsIn postmenopausal women treated for early-stage estrogen receptor-positive BC, neither VET nor MHT was associated with increased risk of recurrence or mortality. A subgroup analysis revealed an increased risk of recurrence, but not mortality, in patients receiving VET with adjuvant aromatase inhibitors.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAromatase InhibitorsCohort StudiesDenmarkEstrogen Replacement TherapyEstrogensFemaleHormone Replacement TherapyHumansMenopauseReceptors, EstrogenAromatase InhibitorsEstrogensReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID35854422
PMCPMC9552278
OpenAlexW4285891395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.