Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35854421›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2023

"Don't Just Study our Distress, Do Something": Implementing and Evaluating a Modified Stepped-Care Model for Health Care Worker Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Kathleen A Sheehan, Christian Schulz-Quach, Lesley A Ruttan, Lindsey MacGillivray, Martha S McKay, Alison Seto, Adrienne Li, Donna E Stewart, Susan E Abbey, Suze G Berkhout

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathleen A SheehanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8700-0809
Christian Schulz-QuachDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5615-2113
Lesley A Ruttan7961Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, 7989University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6431-5023
Lindsey MacGillivrayDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Martha S McKay7961Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, 7989University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alison SetoCentre for Mental Health, 7989University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Adrienne Li7961Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, 7989University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Donna E StewartDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Susan E AbbeyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Suze G BerkhoutDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThroughout the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been concerns about the mental health of health care workers (HCW). Although numerous studies have investigated the level of distress among HCW, few studies have explored programs to improve their mental well-being. In this paper, we describe the implementation and evaluation of a program to support the mental health of HCW at University Health Network (UHN), Canada's largest healthcare network.

methodsUsing a quality improvement approach, we conducted a needs assessment and then created and evaluated a modified stepped-care model to address HCW mental health during the pandemic. This included: online resources focused on psychoeducation and self-management, access to online support and psychotherapeutic groups, and self-referral for individual care from a psychologist or psychiatrist. We used ongoing mixed-methods evaluation, combining quantitative and qualitative analysis, to improve program quality.

resultsThe program is ongoing, running continuously throughout the pandemic. We present data up to November 30, 2021. There were over 12,000 hits to the UHN's COVID mental health intranet web page, which included self-management resources and information on group support. One hundred and sixty-six people self-referred for individual psychological or psychiatric care. The mean wait time from referral to initial appointment was 5.4 days, with an average of seven appointments for each service user. The majority had moderate to severe symptoms of depression and anxiety at referral, with over 20% expressing thoughts of self-harm or suicide. Post-care user feedback, collected through self-report surveys and semistructured interviews, indicated that the program is effective and valued.

conclusionsDevelopment of a high-quality internal mental health support for HCW program is feasible, effective, and highly valued. By using early and frequent feedback from multiple perspectives and stakeholders to address demand and implement changes responsively, the program was adjusted to meet HCW mental health needs as the pandemic evolved.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsReferral and ConsultationCOVID-19healthcare workersmental healthmixed-methods

Identifiers

PMID35854421
PMCPMC9301355
OpenAlexW4286214933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.