Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35854414›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care medicine2023

Indications, Clinical Impact, and Complications of Critical Care Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Scoping Review.

Ross Prager, Joshua Bowdridge, Michael Pratte, Jason Cheng, Matthew Df McInnes, Robert Arntfield

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Right ventricular-protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: phenotypes, monitoring and ventilatory management.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. A Comprehensive Review of Percutaneous and Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Blood Pressure Goals in Critically Ill Patients.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ross PragerDivision of Critical Care, 6221Western University, Stn B. London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8145-8141
Joshua BowdridgeDepartment of Medicine, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Michael PratteDepartment of Medicine, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jason ChengDivision of Critical Care, 6221Western University, Stn B. London, ON, Canada.
Matthew Df McInnesDepartment of Radiology, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Robert ArntfieldDivision of Critical Care, 6221Western University, Stn B. London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4954-487X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical care transesophageal echocardiography (ccTEE) is an increasingly popular tool used by intensivists to characterize and manage hemodynamics at the bedside. Its usage appears to be driven by expanded diagnostic scope as well as the limitations of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) - lack of acoustic windows, patient positioning, and competing clinical interests (eg, the need to perform chest compressions). The objectives of this scoping review were to determine the indications, clinical impact, and complications of ccTEE.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and six major conferences were searched without a time or language restriction on March 31

resultsOf the 4403 abstracts screened, 289 studies underwent full-text review, with 108 studies (6739 patients) included. Most studies were retrospective (66%), performed in academic centers (84%), in the intensive care unit (73%), and were observational (55%). The most common indications for ccTEE were hemodynamic instability, trauma, cardiac arrest, respiratory failure, and procedural guidance. Across multiple indications, ccTEE was reported to change the diagnosis in 52% to 78% of patients and change management in 32% to79% patients. During cardiac arrest, ccTEE identified the cause of arrest in 25% to 35% of cases. Complications of ccTEE included two cases of significant gastrointestinal bleeding requiring intervention, but no other major complications (death or esophageal perforation) reported.

conclusionsThe use of ccTEE has been described for the diagnosis and management of a broad range of clinical problems. Overall, ccTEE was commonly reported to offer additional diagnostic yield beyond TTE with a low observed complication rate. Additional high quality ccTEE studies will permit stronger conclusions and a more precise understanding of the trends observed in this scoping review.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, TransesophagealHeart ArrestAdultCritical CareEchocardiographyHumansRetrospective Studiescardiac arrestcritical carediagnostic imagingechocardiographyresuscitationshockultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35854414
PMCPMC9806486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.