Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35854297›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2022

Surgeons' requirements for a surgical support system to improve laparoscopic access.

Moritz Spiller, Marcus Bruennel, Victoria Grosse, Thomas Sühn, Nazila Esmaeili, Jessica Stockheim, Salmai Turial, Roland Croner, Axel Boese, Michael Friebe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Moritz SpillerINKA-Innovation Laboratory for Image Guided Therapy (IGTLAB), Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. moritz@surag-medical.com.
Marcus BruennelOtto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Victoria GrosseOtto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Thomas SühnINKA-Innovation Laboratory for Image Guided Therapy (IGTLAB), Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Nazila EsmaeiliINKA-Innovation Laboratory for Image Guided Therapy (IGTLAB), Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jessica StockheimDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Salmai TurialDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Roland CronerDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Axel BoeseINKA-Innovation Laboratory for Image Guided Therapy (IGTLAB), Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Michael FriebeOtto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Alfredo IllanesINKA-Innovation Laboratory for Image Guided Therapy (IGTLAB), Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie 03EFOST032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Creating surgical access is a critical step in laparoscopic surgery. Surgeons have to insert a sharp instrument such as the Veress needle or a trocar into the patient's abdomen until the peritoneal cavity is reached. They solely rely on their experience and distorted tactile feedback in that process, leading to a complication rate as high as 14% of all cases. Recent studies have shown the feasibility of surgical support systems that provide intraoperative feedback regarding the insertion process to improve laparoscopic access outcomes. However, to date, the surgeons' requirements for such support systems remain unclear. This research article presents the results of an explorative study that aimed to acquire data about the information that helps surgeons improve laparoscopic access outcomes. The results indicate that feedback regarding the reaching of the peritoneal cavity is of significant importance and should be presented visually or acoustically. Finally, a solution should be straightforward and intuitive to use, should support or even improve the clinical workflow, but also cheap enough to facilitate its usage rate. While this study was tailored to laparoscopic access, its results also apply to other minimally invasive procedures.

Indexed as

LaparoscopySurgeonsAbdomenHumansNeedlesSurgical InstrumentsAudio sensingCapnoperitoneumIntraoperative support systemsLaparoscopic accessLaparoscopyMinimally invasive surgeryOnline questionnairePeritoneal cavityPneumoperitoneumSurvey

Identifiers

PMID35854297
PMCPMC9297603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.