Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35854267›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Evaluating the impact of a novel behavioural science informed animation upon breast cancer screening uptake: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Amish Acharya, Hutan Ashrafian, Deborah Cunningham, Josephine Ruwende, Ara Darzi, Gaby Judah

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05395871 nacompletednot on this map

Investigating the Use of Behavioural Science Informed Messages to Facilitate Attendance at Breast Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2022 to 2023Enrolled34,047ConditionsBreast CancerArmsBehavioural Message, Behavioural Message + Video, Usual Care Message
NCT06163222 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Can User-centred Design and Behavioural-science Informed Interventions Improve Equity in Outpatient Access in North West London? A Non-randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2024 to 2024Enrolled13,389ConditionsBehavioural Science Interventions to Improve Health EquityArmsAdditional message with behavioural science-informed content and associated web pages, Usual communication strategy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amish AcharyaDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, St Mary's Hospital, 10th Floor Queen Elizabeth Queen Mother Building, W2 1NY, London, UK. aa2107@ic.ac.uk.
Hutan AshrafianDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, St Mary's Hospital, 10th Floor Queen Elizabeth Queen Mother Building, W2 1NY, London, UK.
Deborah CunninghamDepartment of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, W2 1NY, London, UK.
Josephine RuwendeNHS England (London Region), London, UK.
Ara DarziDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, St Mary's Hospital, 10th Floor Queen Elizabeth Queen Mother Building, W2 1NY, London, UK.
Gaby JudahDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, St Mary's Hospital, 10th Floor Queen Elizabeth Queen Mother Building, W2 1NY, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer screening is estimated to save 1300 lives annually in the United Kingdom. Despite this, uptake of invitations has fallen over the past decade. Behavioural science-informed interventions addressing the determinants of attendance behaviour have shown variable effectiveness. This may be due to the narrow repertoire of techniques trialled, and the difficulties of implementation at a population-scale. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact on breast screening uptake of a novel behavioural video intervention which can contain more complex combinations of behavioural change techniques.

methodsA 3-armed randomised controlled trial will be undertaken in London comparing the impact of (1) the usual care SMS reminder, to (2) a behavioural plain text SMS reminder and (3) a novel video sent as a link within the behavioural plain text SMS reminder. A total of 8391 participants (2797 per group) will be allocated to one of the three trial arms using a computer randomisation process, based upon individuals' healthcare identification numbers. The novel video has been co-designed with a diverse range of women to overcome the barriers faced by underserved communities and the wider population. The behavioural SMS content has also been co-designed through the same process as the video. Messages will be sent through the current reminder system used by the London screening programmes, with reminders 7 days and 2 days prior to a timed appointment. The primary outcome is attendance at breast cancer screening within 3 months of the initial invitation. Secondary outcomes will include evaluating the impact of each message amongst socio-demographic groups and according to the appointment type e.g. first invitation or recall. DISCUSSION: In addition to general declining trends in attendance, there is also concern of increasing healthcare inequalities with breast cancer screening in London. The current novel intervention, designed with underserved groups and the general population, incorporates several behavioural techniques to overcome the barriers to attendance. Understanding its potential impact in a real-world setting therefore may provide significant information on how to address reducing attendance and healthcare disparities.

trial registrationThis study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT05395871 ) on the 27

Indexed as

Behavioral SciencesBreast NeoplasmsText MessagingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReminder SystemsBehavioural scienceBreast cancer screeningHealthcare inequalitiesScreening uptakeVideo messaging

Identifiers

PMID35854267
PMCPMC9295097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.