Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35854217›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Planning is not equivalent to preparing, how Dutch women perceive their pregnancy planning in relation to preconceptional lifestyle behaviour change - a cross-sectional study.

Veronique Y F Maas, Marjolein Poels, Marleen H de Kievit, Anniek P Hartog, Arie Franx, Maria P H Koster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Maternal health agency in women with a low socioeconomic status: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Veronique Y F MaasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. v.maas@erasmusmc.nl.
Marjolein PoelsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marleen H de KievitDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Anniek P HartogDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Arie FranxDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Maria P H KosterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnhealthy prenatal lifestyle behaviours are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, but little is known about what motivates women to comply with preconceptional lifestyle recommendations or consciously plan their pregnancy. Therefore, the objective of this study is to explore the associations between preconceptional lifestyle behaviours, health beliefs and pregnancy planning among Dutch pregnant women.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study based on the data of the APROPOS-II study, 1,077 low-risk pregnant women were eligible for inclusion. Preconception lifestyle behaviours and actively preparing for pregnancy were assessed in relation to planned pregnancies (based on the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancies) and health beliefs (14 statements). The following preconceptional lifestyle behaviours were assessed through a self-administered questionnaire in the first trimester of pregnancy: fruit intake, vegetable intake, caffeine intake, (second-hand)smoking, alcohol intake, folic acid supplement use and exercise. Data were analysed using multivariate logistic regression analyses.

resultsA total of 921 (85.5%) women in our cohort had a planned pregnancy. However, of these women, 640 (69.5%) adequately used folic acid supplements and 465 (50.5%) women consumed alcohol at any point during pregnancy. Of the women considering themselves 'healthy enough and not needing preconception care', 48 (9.1%) women had an adequate vegetable intake, 294 (55.6%) women consumed alcohol at any point during pregnancy and 161 (30.4%) women were either over-or underweight.

conclusionDespite consciously planning their pregnancy, most women did not adhere to preconceptional lifestyle behaviour recommendations. Women's health beliefs and overestimation of their health status seem to interfere with actively planning and preparing for pregnancy. Findings from our study may encourage the development of prospective health-promoting interventions that focus on health beliefs and actively preparing for pregnancy, to improve preconceptional lifestyle behaviours, thereby optimizing the health of future generations.

Indexed as

Life StylePreconception CareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFolic AcidHumansPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedProspective StudiesFolic AcidHealth BeliefsHealth PromotionLifestyle BehavioursPreconception CarePregnancy Planning

Identifiers

PMID35854217
PMCPMC9295368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.