ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2022
Finite-Size Effects in Simulations of Peptide/Lipid Assembly.
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate determination of the preferred aggregation number of a micelle-encapsulated membrane protein dimer.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Accurate determination of the preferred aggregation number of a micelle-encapsulated membrane protein dimer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- System size effects on the free energy landscapes from molecular dynamics of phase-separating bilayers.The Journal of chemical physics · 2024Article
- Ion-Induced PIP2 Clustering with Martini3: Modification of Phosphate-Ion Interactions and Comparison with CHARMM36.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Anomalous Diffusion of Polyelectrolyte Segments on Supported Charged Lipid Bilayers.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular dynamics simulations are an attractive tool for understanding lipid/peptide self-assembly but can be plagued by inaccuracies when the system sizes are too small. The general guidance from self-assembly simulations of homogeneous micelles is that the total number of surfactants should be three to five times greater than the equilibrium aggregate number of surfactants per micelle. Herein, the heuristic is tested on the more complicated self-assembly of lipids and amphipathic peptides using the Cooke and Martini 3 coarse-grained models. Cooke model simulations with 50 to 1000 lipids and no peptide are dominated by finite-size effects, with usually one aggregate (micelle or nanodisc) containing most of the lipids forming at each system size. Approximately 200 systems of different peptide/lipid (P/L) ratios and sizes of up to 1000 lipids yield a "finite-size phase diagram" for peptide driven self-assembly, including a coexistence region of micelles and discs. Insights from the Cooke model are applied to the assembly of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine and the ELK-neutral peptide using the Martini 3 model. Systems of 150, 450, and 900 lipids with P/L = 1/6.25 form mixtures of lipid-rich discs that agree in size with experiment and peptide-rich micelles. Only the 150-lipid system shows finite-size effects, which arise from the long-tailed distribution of aggregate sizes. The general rule of three to five times the equilibrium aggregate size remains a practical heuristic for the Cooke and Martini 3 systems investigated here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.