ArticlePediatric research2023
Integrating structured and unstructured data for timely prediction of bloodstream infection among children.
Article in Pediatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in infection surveillance: Data integration, applications and future directions.Biomedical journal · 2026Review
- Performance Degradation between Development and Deployment of a Predictive Model for Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Hospitalized Children.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Snowflake Data Warehouse for Large-Scale and Diverse Biological Data Management and Analysis.Genes · 2024Review
- Machine learning algorithms for the early detection of bloodstream infection in children with osteoarticular infections.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Integrative Serum Metabolic Fingerprints Based Multi-Modal Platforms for Lung Adenocarcinoma Early Detection and Pulmonary Nodule Classification.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospitalized children with central venous lines (CVLs) are at higher risk of hospital-acquired infections. Information in electronic health records (EHRs) can be employed in training deep learning models to predict the onset of these infections. We incorporated clinical notes in addition to structured EHR data to predict serious bloodstream infections, defined as positive blood culture followed by at least 4 days of new antimicrobial agent administration, among hospitalized children with CVLs.
methodsStructured EHR information and clinical notes were extracted for a retrospective cohort including all hospitalized patients with CVLs at a single tertiary care pediatric health system from 2013 to 2018. Deep learning models were trained to determine the added benefit of incorporating the information embedded in clinical notes in predicting serious bloodstream infection.
resultsA total of 24,351 patient encounters met inclusion criteria. The best-performing model restricted to structured EHR data had a specificity of 0.951 and positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.056 when the sensitivity was set to 0.85. The addition of contextualized word embeddings improved the specificity to 0.981 and PPV to 0.113.
conclusionsIntegrating clinical notes with structured EHR data improved the prediction of serious bloodstream infections among pediatric patients with CVLs. IMPACT: Developed an advanced infection prediction model in pediatrics that integrates the structured and unstructured EHRs. Extracted information from clinical notes to do timely prediction in a clinical setting. Developed a deep learning model framework that can be employed in predicting rare events in a complex and dynamic environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.