Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35854053›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Machine learning approach towards explaining water quality dynamics in an urbanised river.

Benjamin Schäfer, Christian Beck, Hefin Rhys, Helena Soteriou, Paul Jennings, Allen Beechey, Catherine M Heppell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin SchäferQueen Mary University of London, School of Mathematical Sciences, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK. benjamin.schaefer@kit.edu.
Christian BeckQueen Mary University of London, School of Mathematical Sciences, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Hefin RhysThe Francis Crick Institute, Flow Cytometry Science Technology Platform, London, UK.
Helena SoteriouThames Water, Clearwater Court, Vastern Road, Reading, RG1 8DB, UK.
Paul JenningsRiver Chess Association, Croxley Green, UK.
Allen BeecheyChilterns Chalk Streams Project, Chilterns Conservation Board, Chinnor, Oxfordshire, OX39 4HA, UK.
Catherine M HeppellQueen Mary University of London, School of Geography, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.

Funding

Marie Curie Marie-Sklodowska-Curie Grant agreement No 840825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activities alter river water quality and quantity, with consequences for the ecosystems of urbanised rivers. Quantifying the role of human-induced drivers in controlling spatio-temporal patterns in water quality is critical to develop successful strategies for improving the ecological health of urban rivers. Here, we analyse high-frequency electrical conductivity and temperature data collected from the River Chess in South-East England during a Citizen Science project. Utilizing machine learning, we find that boosted trees outperform GAM and accurately describe water quality dynamics with less than 1% error. SHapley Additive exPlanations reveal the importance of and the (inter)dependencies between the individual variables, such as river level and Wastewater Treatment Works (WWTW) outflow. WWTW outflows give rise to diurnal variations in electrical conductivity, which are detectable throughout the year, and to an increase in average water temperature of 1 [Formula: see text] in a 2 km reach downstream of the wastewater treatment works during low flows. Overall, we showcase how high-frequency water quality measurements initiated by a Citizen Science project, together with machine learning techniques, can help untangle key drivers of water quality dynamics in an urbanised chalk stream.

Indexed as

Water Pollutants, ChemicalWater QualityEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringHumansMachine LearningRiversWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID35854053
PMCPMC9295889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.