ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2022
Root canal width as a mandibular maturity marker at the 18-year threshold in the Maltese population.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Population-specific validation of the distal root canal width method for forensic age estimation in a Spanish sample.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Root canal widths of mandibular molars in predicting the legal age threshold 18 years in a sample of juveniles and sub-adults of south-indian origin: an orthopantomographic study.International journal of legal medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe determination of age of majority (the 18-year-old threshold) using the popular Demirjian tooth staging method is unreliable, so other maturity markers are required. This study examines whether the ratio of the root canal widths (RCW) of the mandibular first, second and third molars is a useful indicator of age.
methodsNine hundred eighteen dental panoramic radiographs (DPT) were examined and the ratio of the mid-points of the distal roots of the left mandibular first, second and third molars assessed according to the RCW stages as described by Roberts (J Forensic Sci 62:351-354, 2017).
resultsIndividuals who had reached stages RCW-A and RCW-B were represented in a wide range of ages spanning the 18-year-old threshold. Individuals who had reached Stage RCW-C were all above the 18-year-old threshold. It was not possible to analyse a large number of DPTs for various reasons. DISCUSSION: Individuals categorised as stage RCW-C may be deemed to have reached the 18-year-old threshold. These results are consistent with other published studies. Variation in root morphology and in the rate of development of the third molar limits the applicability of this method.
conclusionsRCW staging is an accurate method of determining the 18-year-old threshold. Its limited applicability requires the use of substitute markers in a large number of cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.