Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35853890›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

Validation of accelerometry as a digital phenotyping measure of negative symptoms in schizophrenia.

Gregory P Strauss, Ian M Raugh, Luyu Zhang, Lauren Luther, Hannah C Chapman, Daniel N Allen, Brian Kirkpatrick, Alex S Cohen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory P StraussDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. gstrauss@uga.edu.
Ian M RaughDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Luyu ZhangDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Lauren LutherDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Hannah C ChapmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Daniel N AllenDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Brian KirkpatrickDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Alex S CohenDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-6904
University of Georgia · USLouisiana State University · USUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

Modeling Anhedonia in Schizophrenia: A Stochastic Dynamical Systems ApproachR21MH112925 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI STRAUSS, GREGORY P · 2017 to 2018
$417k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH112925U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R21-MH112925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative symptoms are commonly assessed via clinical rating scales; however, these measures have several inherent limitations that impact validity and utility for their use in clinical trials. Objective digital phenotyping measures that overcome some of these limitations are now available. The current study evaluated the validity of accelerometry (ACL), a passive digital phenotyping method that involves collecting data on the presence, vigor, and variability of movement. Outpatients with schizophrenia (SZ: n = 50) and demographically matched healthy controls (CN: n = 70) had ACL continuously recorded from a smartphone and smartband for 6 days. Active digital phenotyping assessments, including surveys related to activity context, were also collected via 8 daily surveys throughout the 6 day period. SZ participants had lower scores on phone ACL variables reflecting vigor and variability of movement compared to CN. ACL variables demonstrated convergent validity as indicated by significant correlations with active digital phenotyping self-reports of time spent in goal-directed activities and clinical ratings of negative symptoms. The discriminant validity of ACL was demonstrated by low correlations with clinical rating scale measures of positive, disorganized, and total symptoms. Collectively, findings suggest that ACL is a valid objective measure of negative symptoms that may complement traditional approaches to assessing the construct using clinical rating scales.

Identifiers

PMID35853890
PMCPMC9261099
OpenAlexW4283361165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.