Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35853865›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2022

Views of health care users and providers: Solutions to improve the prevention of secondary health conditions among people with spinal cord injury, South Africa.

Sonti Pilusa, Hellen Myezwa, Joanne Potterton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonti PilusaPhysiotherapy Department, School of Therapeutic Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, South Africa. sonti.pilusa@wits.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0003-0606-9669
Hellen MyezwaSchool of Therapeutic Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, South Africa. hellen.myezwa@wits.ac.za.
Joanne PottertonPhysiotherapy Department, School of Therapeutic Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, South Africa. joanne.potterton@wits.ac.za.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Wellcome Trust 107768/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designExplorative- qualitative study.

objectiveThis study explored solutions to improve the prevention of secondary health conditions in people with spinal cord injury.

settingRehabilitation hospital, South Africa.

methodsFace to face semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 therapists and 17 people with spinal cord injury at a public rehabilitation hospital. All the interviews were transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was conducted on the transcripts to identify proposed solutions to improve the prevention of secondary health conditions.

resultsThe main theme that emerged was access to adequate health care. The categories linked to the main theme were: availability of health services, patient-centred care, strengthening rehabilitation care, access to resources and training health professionals.

conclusionsAccess to adequate health is central to preventing and managing secondary health conditions. Care for people with spinal cord injury needs to be empowering and address rehabilitation care needs across the lifespan. The proposed solutions will inform the development of a prevention care model for secondary health conditions in people with spinal cord injury.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesDelivery of Health CareHealth FacilitiesHumansQualitative ResearchSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID35853865
PMCPMC9296448
OpenAlexW4285798504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.