Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35853697›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2023

Onset-to-treatment time and aneurysmal regression predict improvement of cranial neuropathy after flow diversion treatment in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery aneurysms.

Ryo Akiyama, Akira Ishii, Takayuki Kikuchi, Masakazu Okawa, Yukihiro Yamao, Yu Abekura, Isao Ono, Natsuhi Sasaki, Hirofumi Tsuji, Hirotoshi Imamura and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ryo AkiyamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8700-3209
Akira IshiiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan ishiiakira@gmail.com.
Takayuki KikuchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6295-5510
Masakazu OkawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Yukihiro YamaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9615-2353
Yu AbekuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Isao OnoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Natsuhi SasakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8206-3352
Hirofumi TsujiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Hirotoshi ImamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8923-7861
Taketo HatanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan.
Nobuyuki SakaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Susumu MiyamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPKobe City Medical Center General Hospital · JPKokura Memorial Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough flow diversion plays a pivotal role in treating internal carotid artery aneurysms presenting with cranial neuropathy, predictors of symptom improvement have not been established.

objectiveTo investigate improvement of symptoms after flow diversion treatment in patients with internal carotid artery aneurysms causing cranial neuropathy, with sufficient follow-up period. Additionally, to examine factors associated with improvement of symptoms.

methodsThis retrospective multicenter study examined patients with unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms presenting with cranial neuropathy who were treated using flow diversion and followed up for at least 12 months. Study outcomes were transient worsening of symptoms and symptom status 12 months after treatment. Patient and aneurysm characteristics were statistically analyzed.

resultsSeventy-seven patients were included. Data needed for outcome analysis were available for 66 patients. At the 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-month, and last follow-ups, the proportion of patients with resolved or improved symptoms was 26% (20/77), 51% (39/77), 74% (57/77), 83% (64/77), and 79%(62/77), respectively. Symptom onset-to-treatment time <6 months (OR=24.2; 95% CI 3.09 to 188.84; p=0.002) and aneurysmal regression (OR=23.1; 95% CI 1.97 to 271.75; p=0.012) were significantly associated with symptom improvement. Transient symptom worsening and worse symptoms at 12 months occurred in 19/77 (25%) and 2/77 (3%) patients, respectively.

conclusionsThe rate of cranial neuropathy symptom improvement after flow diversion increased over the first 12 months after treatment, but not thereafter. Treatment within 6 months of symptom onset and aneurysmal regression were predictors of symptom improvement.

Indexed as

Carotid Artery DiseasesCranial Nerve DiseasesEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmCarotid Artery, InternalHumansRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeAneurysmCranial nerveFlow Diverter

Identifiers

PMID35853697
PMCPMC10447392
OpenAlexW4285798815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.