ArticleAnalytical chemistry2022
Rapid Immunochemical Methods for Anatoxin-a Monitoring in Environmental Water Samples.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Progress in the Detection and Monitoring of Toxin-Producing Cyanoprokaryotes and Their Toxins.Toxics · 2026Review
- Review
- Detection of Anatoxins in Human Urine by Liquid Chromatography Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry and ELISA.Toxins · 2024Article
- A Direct Analysis of β-Toxins · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Algal blooms that contaminate freshwater resources with cyanotoxins constitute, nowadays, a global concern. To deal with this problem, a variety of analytical methods, including immunochemical assays, are available for the main algal toxins, for example, microcystins, nodularins, and saxitoxins, with the remarkable exception of anatoxin-a. Now, for the first time, highly sensitive, enantioselective immunoassays for anatoxin-a have been validated using homemade monoclonal antibodies. Two competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were developed in different formats, with detection limits for (+)-anatoxin-a of 0.1 ng/mL. Excellent recovery values between 82 and 117%, and coefficients of variation below 20%, were observed using environmental water samples fortified between 0.5 and 500 ng/mL. In addition, a lateral-flow immunochromatographic assay was optimized for visual and instrumental reading of results. This test showed a visual detection limit for (+)-anatoxin-a of 4 ng/mL. Performance with a reader was validated in accordance with the European guidelines for semiquantitative rapid methods for small chemical contaminants. Thus, at a screening target concentration of 2 ng/mL, the probability of a blank sample to be classified as "suspect" was as low as 0.2%. Finally, the optimized direct enzyme immunoassay was validated by comparison with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy data and showed a good correlation (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.