Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35853079›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Experimental animal models and their use in understanding cysticercosis: A systematic review.

Muloongo C Sitali, Veronika Schmidt, Racheal Mwenda, Chummy S Sikasunge, Kabemba E Mwape, Martin C Simuunza, Clarissa P da Costa, Andrea S Winkler, Isaac K Phiri

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. IsPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Experimental brain infection with cysticercosis in sheep.Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Muloongo C SitaliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0003-4406-1115
Veronika SchmidtCentre for Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Racheal MwendaDepartment of Paraclinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Chummy S SikasungeDepartment of Paraclinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Kabemba E MwapeDepartment of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Martin C SimuunzaDepartment of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Clarissa P da CostaInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andrea S WinklerDepartment of Neurology, Centre for Global Health, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Isaac K PhiriDepartment of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
University of Zambia · ZMInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DETUM Klinikum · DEUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCysticercosis and Neurocysticercosis (NCC) can be studied using several animal species in experimental models which contributes to the understanding of the human form of the disease. Experimental infections of Taenia spp. are vital in explaining the modes of transmission of the parasite and helps the understanding of transmission of the parasite in humans and thus may be useful in designing therapeutic and immune-prophylactic studies to combat the disease. Thus, this systematic review aims to explore the existing experimental animal models to the understanding of cysticercosis in both humans and animals and elucidate the risk factors of cysticercosis and identify the Taenia spp. used in these models. METHODOLOGY: We systematically identified all publications from the Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Pubmed regarding experimental animal models using Taenia spp. that cause cysticercosis in both humans and animals. 58 studies were identified for eligibility. Of these, only 48 studies met the inclusion criteria from which data extraction was done and presented descriptively.

resultsPigs, cattle, gerbils, mice, rats, voles, monkeys, cats, dogs, and goats were used in which T. solium, T. saginata, T. saginata asiatica, T. crassiceps and T. asiatica were studied. The routes used to induce disease were; oral, intravenous, subcutaneous, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, intraarterial, intracranial, intraduodenal, and surgical routes using eggs, oncospheres, and proglottids. Besides, the establishment of infection using eggs and oncospheres was affected by the route used to induce infection in the experimental animals. The cysticerci recovery rate in all the experimental studies was low and the number of animals used in these experiments varied from 1 to 84. Although not analysed statistically, sex, age, and breed of animals influenced the cysticerci recovery rate. Additionally, the cysticerci recovery rate and antibody-antigen levels were shown to increase with an increase in the dose of oncospheres and eggs inoculated in the animals. Contrasting results were reported in which the cysticerci recovery rate decreased with an increase in the dose of eggs inoculated.

conclusionThis review describes the various animal experiments using Taenia species that cause cysticercosis highlighting the animals used, age and their breed, the routes of infection used to induce disease and the sample size used, and the cysticerci recovery rate in these animal models.

Indexed as

CysticercosisNeurocysticercosisTaeniaTaenia soliumAnimalsCattleCysticercusDogsHumansMiceModels, AnimalRatsSwine

Identifiers

PMID35853079
PMCPMC9295976
OpenAlexW4286218409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.