Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35853022›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Effects of day-to-day variation of Opisthorchis viverrini antigen in urine on the accuracy of diagnosing opisthorchiasis in Northeast Thailand.

Chanika Worasith, Phattharaphon Wongphutorn, Chutima Homwong, Kulthida Y Kopolrat, Anchalee Techasen, Raynoo Thanan, Chatanun Eamudomkarn, Chompunoot Wangboon, Narong Khuntikeo, Watcharin Loilome and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence and Epidemiological Patterns ofMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Liver Flukes: Clonorchis and Opisthorchis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chanika WorasithDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Phattharaphon WongphutornCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Chutima HomwongCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Kulthida Y KopolratFaculty of Public Health, Kasetsart University Chalermphrakiat Sakon Nakhon Province Campus, Sakon Nakhon, Thailand.
Anchalee TechasenCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4230-5641
Raynoo ThananDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Chatanun EamudomkarnDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Chompunoot WangboonSchool of Preclinical Science, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Rachasima, Thailand.
Narong KhuntikeoCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Watcharin LoilomeCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Jiraporn SithithawornFaculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Thomas CrellenInstitute for Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Paiboon SithithawornDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9480-1778
Khon Kaen University · THKasetsart University · THSuranaree University of Technology · THUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 215919/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antigen detection in urine using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is more sensitive than fecal examination for diagnosis of opisthorchiasis and for assessment of the effects of drug treatment. It is not known whether day-to-day variation of urine composition, including levels of Opisthorchis viverrini antigen, influences the urine assay. We investigated this topic with the cooperation of participants from two localities in Northeast Thailand. Project participants were screened for parasite infections for three consecutive days using the quantitative formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) to detect O. viverrini eggs and the urine ELISA for detection of O. viverrini antigen. A subset of participants (n = 801) with matched fecal and urine samples were analyzed for comparison of inter-day prevalence estimates and the performance of the urine assay compared against FECT for diagnosis of opisthorchiasis. The daily prevalence measured by the urine assay ranged between 29.0%-30.2% while those by FECT ranged between 11.9%-20.2%. The cumulative three-day prevalence estimate determined by the urine antigen assay was 30.3%, which was significantly higher than that by FECT (20.2%, p < 0.05). A significant positive correlation was found between the concentration of antigen in urine and fecal egg counts (p < 0.001). Overall, the urine assay had better diagnostic performance for opisthorchiasis than fecal examination by FECT. The high sensitivity plus negligible daily variation of O. viverrini antigen in urine indicates the utility of the urine assay for diagnosis, as well as population screening, of opisthorchiasis.

Indexed as

OpisthorchiasisOpisthorchisAnimalsAntigens, HelminthFecesHumansThailandAntigens, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID35853022
PMCPMC9295949
OpenAlexW4285794103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.