Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35852829›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Extraction of Explicit and Implicit Cause-Effect Relationships in Patient-Reported Diabetes-Related Tweets From 2017 to 2021: Deep Learning Approach.

Adrian Ahne, Vivek Khetan, Xavier Tannier, Md Imbesat Hassan Rizvi, Thomas Czernichow, Francisco Orchard, Charline Bour, Andrew Fano, Guy Fagherazzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Transformers and large language models in healthcare: A review.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adrian AhneCenter of Epidemiology and Population Health, Inserm, Hospital Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9463-9064
Vivek KhetanAccenture Labs, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4394-4859
Xavier TannierLaboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e-Santé, Inserm, University Sorbonne Paris Nord, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2452-8868
Md Imbesat Hassan RizviIndian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0150-8677
Thomas CzernichowEpiconcept Company, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8918-6352
Francisco OrchardEpiconcept Company, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5793-3301
Charline BourDeep Digital Phenotyping Research Unit, Department of Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8537-2097
Andrew FanoAccenture Labs, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Guy FagherazziDeep Digital Phenotyping Research Unit, Department of Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5033-5966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntervening in and preventing diabetes distress requires an understanding of its causes and, in particular, from a patient's perspective. Social media data provide direct access to how patients see and understand their disease and consequently show the causes of diabetes distress.

objectiveLeveraging machine learning methods, we aim to extract both explicit and implicit cause-effect relationships in patient-reported diabetes-related tweets and provide a methodology to better understand the opinions, feelings, and observations shared within the diabetes online community from a causality perspective.

methodsMore than 30 million diabetes-related tweets in English were collected between April 2017 and January 2021. Deep learning and natural language processing methods were applied to focus on tweets with personal and emotional content. A cause-effect tweet data set was manually labeled and used to train (1) a fine-tuned BERTweet model to detect causal sentences containing a causal relation and (2) a conditional random field model with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)-based features to extract possible cause-effect associations. Causes and effects were clustered in a semisupervised approach and visualized in an interactive cause-effect network.

resultsCausal sentences were detected with a recall of 68% in an imbalanced data set. A conditional random field model with BERT-based features outperformed a fine-tuned BERT model for cause-effect detection with a macro recall of 68%. This led to 96,676 sentences with cause-effect relationships. "Diabetes" was identified as the central cluster followed by "death" and "insulin." Insulin pricing-related causes were frequently associated with death.

conclusionsA novel methodology was developed to detect causal sentences and identify both explicit and implicit, single and multiword cause, and the corresponding effect, as expressed in diabetes-related tweets leveraging BERT-based architectures and visualized as cause-effect network. Extracting causal associations in real life, patient-reported outcomes in social media data provide a useful complementary source of information in diabetes research.

Indexed as

causalitycausal relation extractiondeep learningdiabetesmachine learningnatural language processingsocial mediasocial media data

Identifiers

PMID35852829
PMCPMC9346561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.