Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35852778›Full record

ArticleOdontology2023

Comparison of heat production and bone architecture changes in the implant site preparation with compressive osteotomes, osseodensification technique, piezoelectric devices, and standard drills: an ex vivo study on porcine ribs.

Nishith Bhargava, Vittoria Perrotti, Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio, Victor Haruo Matsubara, Diana Patalwala, Alessandro Quaranta

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advanced Piezoelectric Materials, Devices, and Systems for Orthopedic Medicine.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  11. Electrostrategies in orthopaedic research.Biomaterials translational · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Temperature Changes (ΔJournal of functional biomaterials · 2024
    Article
  15. Breakthroughs in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nishith Bhargava *Dental School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Vittoria Perrotti *Deptartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. D'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 31, 66100, Chieti, Italy. v.perrotti@unich.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7652-1660
Vito Carlo Alberto CaponioDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Victor Haruo MatsubaraDental School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Diana PatalwalaCentre for Microscopy, Characterization and Analysis, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Alessandro QuarantaSchool of Dentistry, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The University of Western Australia · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Foggia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed at investigating differences in heat generation and bone architecture following four different implant site preparation techniques: compressive osteotomes, conventional drills, osseodensification (OD mode with osseodensification drills), and piezoelectric systems. Porcine rib bones were used as a model for implant surgery. Thermocouples were employed to measure temperature changes, and micro-CT to assess the bone architecture. The primary stability and insertion torque values of the implants placed in the differently prepared sites were assessed. The temperature changes were higher with Piezo. The average primary stability using the ISQ scale was the greatest for drills (76.17 ± 0.90) and the lowest for osteotomes (71.50 ± 11.09). Insertion torque was significantly higher with the osseodensification method (71.67 ± 7.99 Ncm) in comparison to drills, osteotomes, and piezo. Osteotomes showed the highest bone to implant contact percentage (39.83 ± 3.14%) and average trabecular number (2.02 ± 0.21 per mm), while drills exhibited the lowest (30.73 ± 1.65%; 1.37 ± 0.34 per mm). Total implant site bone volume was the highest with osseodensification (37.26 ± 4.13mm

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsAnimalsDental Implantation, EndosseousOsteotomyRibsSwineThermogenesisDental ImplantsDental implantsDrillsMicro-CTOsseodensification techniqueOsteotomesPiezoelectric devicePrimary stability

Identifiers

PMID35852778
PMCPMC9810586
OpenAlexW4285795716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.