Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35852742›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Trends of microplastic abundance in personal care products in the United Arab Emirates over the period of 3 years (2018-2020).

Rana Zeeshan Habib, Jawaher A K Aldhanhani, Alia Hilal Ali, Furtuna Ghebremedhin, Mariam Elkashlan, Mikal Mesfun, Wajeeh Kittaneh, Ruwaya Al Kindi, Thies Thiemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rana Zeeshan HabibDepartment of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, PO Box 15551, Al Ain, UAE.
Jawaher A K AldhanhaniDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, PO Box 15551, Al Ain, UAE.
Alia Hilal AliDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, PO Box 15551, Al Ain, UAE.
Furtuna GhebremedhinDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, PO Box 15551, Al Ain, UAE.
Mariam ElkashlanDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, PO Box 15551, Al Ain, UAE.
Mikal MesfunDepartment of Geology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, PO Box 15551, Al Ain, UAE.
Wajeeh KittanehDepartment of Geology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, PO Box 15551, Al Ain, UAE.
Ruwaya Al KindiDepartment of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, PO Box 15551, Al Ain, UAE.
Thies ThiemannDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, PO Box 15551, Al Ain, UAE. thies@uaeu.ac.ae.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastic microbeads in cosmetic products are considered one of the main contributors of primary microplastic pollution in aquatic environments. To assess the trends of microplastic usage in rinse-off cosmetic products over the last 3 years in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), 163 body scrub and face wash products were randomly selected and purchased from different UAE markets over a period of two (2019 and 2020) consecutive years as a continuation of our study of such products in 2018. Microbeads were extracted from the products and their composition was determined. The comparative analysis of the products revealed the presence of microplastic content in fewer products in 2019 and 2020 than to 2018. The results revealed that some of the products that contained microplastic in 2018 still have them in 2020. However, no new products were found on the market that contained microplastic. Overall, fewer products contained microbeads of any composition. Also, the consumer awareness, preferences, and behavior towards microplastic use in personal care products was assessed through a survey 2020 that complemented a survey carried out in 2018. An increasing awareness among the surveyed general public was noted regarding microplastic use in cosmetics and its adverse effects to the environment. The study indicates that an increasing global legislation is effective to curtail the use of microplastic containing microbeads in personal care products by replacing them with beads of alternative composition or avoiding the use of microbeads altogether. Nevertheless, products having microplastic content in the UAE were found to be imported or manufactured by companies based in countries where microplastic usage in personal care products has already been banned by law.

Indexed as

CosmeticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalEnvironmental MonitoringMicroplasticsPlasticsUnited Arab EmiratesCosmeticsMicroplasticsPlasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalConsumer trendCosmetic ingredientsLegislationMicrobeadsMicroparticlesMicroplastic

Identifiers

PMID35852742
PMCPMC9294843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.