Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35852699›Full record

ArticleCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2022

Etiology of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Scoping Review.

Dan Cohen, Patrick Fangping Yao, Abhilash Uddandam, Darren de Sa, Michelle E Arakgi

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dan CohenMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Patrick Fangping YaoMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Abhilash UddandamMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Darren de SaMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Michelle E ArakgiMcMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada. michellearakgi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8290-4139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRecent literature was reviewed to identify and summarize the etiology of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) failure reported.

methodsThe databases Embase, PubMed, and Medline were searched on March 10, 2022, for English-language, clinical studies that reported on the etiology of failure of primary ACLR. The studies were systematically screened in duplicate and data abstracted. RECENT

findingsForty-three studies were identified that reported mode of failure in primary ACLR. Trauma (43 studies), technical error (11 studies), and biology (9 studies) remain the most reported etiologies of ACLR failure. A combination of causes was listed in three studies. No reported cause or "other" was listed in 22 studies. Many clinical studies fail to report etiology of ACLR failure. Level of detail provided regarding mode of failure varies widely. Trauma, technical error, and biological failure remain the leading etiologies of ACLR failure reported in recent literature. Technical error is likely underreported and a contributing factor in traumatic failures.

Indexed as

Anterior cruciate ligamentBiologicalFailureReconstructionTechnicalTrauma

Identifiers

PMID35852699
PMCPMC9463419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.