Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35852623›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Use of virtual platform for delivery of simulation-based laparoscopic training curriculum in LMICs.

Zerubabbel K Asfaw, Rachel Todd, Unwana Abasi, Maria Marcela Bailez, Jacqueline Narvaez, Ana Carrasquilla, Raul Hernandez Centeno, Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Linda P Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zerubabbel K AsfawDepartment of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6046-1699
Rachel ToddDepartment of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Unwana AbasiDepartment of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Maria Marcela BailezHospital de Pediatría Dr. J.P. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jacqueline NarvaezSociety of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES): Global Affairs Committee, Los Angeles, USA.
Ana CarrasquillaHospital CIMA, San José, Costa Rica.
Raul Hernandez CentenoGeneral Hospital León, Universidad de Guanajuato, Guanajuato, México.
Guillermo Yanowsky ReyesHospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcade, Guadalajara, México.
Linda P ZhangDepartment of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. linda.zhang@mountsinai.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic surgery is rapidly expanding in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet many surgeons in LMICs have limited formal training in laparoscopy. In 2017, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) implemented Global Laparoscopic Advancement Program (GLAP), an in-person simulation-based laparoscopic training curriculum for surgeons in LMICs. In light of COVID-19, SAGES adapted GLAP to a virtual format with telesimulation. This study explores the feasibility and efficacy of virtual laparoscopic simulation training in resource-limited settings.

methodsParticipants from San Jose, Costa Rica, Leon, México, and Guadalajara, México enrolled in the virtual GLAP curriculum, meeting biweekly for 2-h didactic classes and 2-h hands-on live simulation practice. Surgical residents' laparoscopic skills were evaluated using the five Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) tasks during the initial and final weeks of the program. Participants also completed pre-and post-program surveys assessing their perception of simulation-based training.

resultsThe study cohort consisted of 16 surgical attendings and 20 general surgery residents. A minimum 70% response rate was recorded across all surveys in the study. By the end of GLAP, residents completed all five tasks of the FLS exam within less time relative to their performance at the beginning of the training program (p < 0.05). Respondents (100%) reported that the program was a good use of their time and that education via telesimulation was easily reproduced. Participants indicated that the practice sessions, guidance, and feedback offered by mentors were their favorite elements of the training.

conclusionA virtual simulation-based curriculum can be an effective strategy for laparoscopic skills training. Participants demonstrated an improvement in laparoscopic skills, and they appreciated the mentorship and opportunity to practice laparoscopic skills. Future programs can expand on using a virtual platform as a low-cost, effective strategy for providing laparoscopic skills training to surgeons in LMICs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Internship and ResidencyLaparoscopySimulation TrainingClinical CompetenceCurriculumDeveloping CountriesHumansGlobal surgeryLaparoscopic surgeryLow-and middle-income countriesSimulation-based learningTelementoringTeleproctoring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.