Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35852565›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2022

Neural correlates of risky decision making in Parkinson's disease patients with impulse control disorders.

Marit F L Ruitenberg, Vincent Koppelmans, Tina Wu, Bruno B Averbeck, Kelvin L Chou, Rachael D Seidler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impulsivity in cerebellar ataxia: an online, multidimensional assessment.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Behavioral disorders in Parkinson disease: current view.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Dopamine system involvement in impulse control.Experimental brain research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marit F L Ruitenberg *Department of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7435-3229
Vincent Koppelmans *Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Tina WuDepartment of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Bruno B AverbeckNational Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kelvin L ChouDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rachael D SeidlerDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, 1864 Stadium Road, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. rachaelseidler@ufl.edu.

Funding

Frontal Striatal Systems and Dopamine in Normal and Pathological BehaviorZIAMH002928 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI AVERBECK, BRUNO · 2010 to 2025
$29.0M
Motor Profiles as Novel Biomarker for Alzheimer’s DiseaseK01AG073578 · NIA · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KOPPELMANS, VINCENT · 2021 to 2025
$651k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002928NIA NIH HHS 1K01AG073578NIA NIH HHS K01 AG073578NIMH NIH HHS ZIAMH002928-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience impulse control disorders (ICDs), characterized by deficient voluntary control over impulses, drives, or temptations regarding excessive hedonic behavior. The present study aimed to better understand the neural basis of impulsive, risky decision making in PD patients with ICDs by disentangling potential dysfunctions in decision and outcome mechanisms. We collected fMRI data from 20 patients with ICDs and 28 without ICDs performing an information gathering task. Patients viewed sequences of bead colors drawn from hidden urns and were instructed to infer the majority bead color in each urn. With each new bead, they could choose to either seek more evidence by drawing another bead (draw choice) or make an urn-inference (urn choice followed by feedback). We manipulated risk via the probability of bead color splits (80/20 vs. 60/40) and potential loss following an incorrect inference ($10 vs. $0). Patients also completed the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) to assess impulsivity. Patients with ICDs showed greater urn choice-specific activation in the right middle frontal gyrus, overlapping the dorsal premotor cortex. Across all patients, fewer draw choices (i.e., more impulsivity) were associated with greater activation during both decision making and outcome processing in a variety of frontal and parietal areas, cerebellum, and bilateral striatum. Our findings demonstrate that ICDs in PD are associated with differences in neural processing of risk-related information and outcomes, implicating both reward and sensorimotor dopaminergic pathways.

Indexed as

Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct DisordersParkinson DiseaseDecision MakingHumansImpulsive BehaviorRewardDecision makingfMRIImpulsivityParkinson’s diseaseRisk processing

Identifiers

PMID35852565
PMCPMC10161684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.