Trial reportJAMA2022
Effect of Omecamtiv Mecarbil on Exercise Capacity in Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: The METEORIC-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03759392 (A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Effect of Omecamtiv Mecarbil on Exercise Capacity in Subjects With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Decreased Exercise Tolerance), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Effect of Omecamtiv Mecarbil on Exercise Capacity in Subjects With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Decreased Exercise Tolerance
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors, sacubitril/valsartan, omecamtiv mecarbil, and vericiguat across heart failure phenotypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- KCCQ total symptom score, clinical outcome measures, and adverse events associated with omecamtiv mecarbil for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023Pooled it
- Targeting cardiac myosin in HFrEF: mechanism, clinical evidence, and the role of omecamtiv mecarbil.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- The Influence of Basic Therapy and New Drugs on NO-Dependent Mechanisms of Cardiac Destruction in Chronic Heart Failure.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiac Myosin Activators in Heart Failure: Experimental Advances Amid Clinical Uncertainty.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Tailored therapeutics for cardiomyopathies.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Article
- New Fuels for a Failing Engine: The Impact of Novel Heart Failure Drugs on Functional Capacity.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Review
- Transition to Advanced Heart Failure: From Identification to Improving Prognosis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- 2024 update in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Advances and Therapeutic Prospects.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
- Pharmacological Therapy of HFrEF in 2025: Navigating New Advances and Old Unmet Needs in An Eternal Balance Between Progress and Perplexities.Cardiac failure review · 2025Review
- Omecamtiv mecarbil, a cardiac myosin activator with potential efficacy in heart failure.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2025Article
- Load-dependence of the activation of myosin filaments in heart muscle.The Journal of physiology · 2024Article
- New and future heart failure drugs.Nature cardiovascular research · 2024Review
- Myosin Isoform-Dependent Effect of Omecamtiv Mecarbil on the Regulation of Force Generation in Human Cardiac Muscle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Advancements in Heart Failure Treatment.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Exercise limitation is a cardinal manifestation of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but is not consistently improved by any of the current guideline-directed medical therapies. Objective: To determine whether omecamtiv mecarbil, a novel direct myosin activator that improves cardiac performance and reduces the risk for cardiovascular death or first HF event in HFrEF, can improve peak exercise capacity in patients with chronic HFrEF. Design, Setting, and Participants: Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of patients with HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%), New York Heart Association class II-III symptoms, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level of 200 pg/mL or greater, and baseline peak oxygen uptake (V̇o2) of 75% or less of predicted. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio (omecamtiv mecarbil to placebo) between March 2019 and May 2021 at 63 sites in North America and Europe, with the last patient visit occurring on November 29, 2021. Interventions: Omecamtiv mecarbil (n = 185) or matching placebo (n = 91), given orally twice daily at a dose of 25 mg, 37.5 mg, or 50 mg based on target plasma levels, for 20 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was a change in exercise capacity (peak V̇o2) from baseline to week 20. Secondary end points included total workload, ventilatory efficiency, and daily physical activity as determined by accelerometry. Results: Among 276 patients who were randomized (median age, 64 years; IQR, 55-70 years; 42 women [15%]), 249 (90%) completed the trial. The median left ventricular ejection fraction was 28% (IQR, 21-33) and the median baseline peak V̇o2 was 14.2 mL/kg/min (IQR, 11.6-17.4) in the omecamtiv mecarbil group and 15.0 mL/kg/min (IQR, 12.0-17.2) in the placebo group. Mean change in peak V̇o2 did not differ significantly between the omecamtiv mecarbil and placebo groups (mean, -0.24 mL/kg/min vs 0.21 mL/kg/min; least square mean difference, -0.45 mL/kg/min [95% CI, -1.02 to 0.13]; P = .13). Adverse events included dizziness (omecamtiv mecarbil: 4.9%, placebo: 5.5%), fatigue (omecamtiv mecarbil: 4.9%, placebo: 4.4%), heart failure events (omecamtiv mecarbil: 4.9%, placebo: 4.4%), death (omecamtiv mecarbil: 1.6%, placebo: 1.1%), stroke (omecamtiv mecarbil: 0.5%, placebo: 1.1%), and myocardial infarction (omecamtiv mecarbil: 0%, placebo: 1.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with chronic HFrEF, omecamtiv mecarbil did not significantly improve exercise capacity over 20 weeks compared with placebo. These findings do not support the use of omecamtiv mecarbil for treatment of HFrEF for improvement of exercise capacity. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759392.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.