ArticleJournal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists2024
The Role of Multiple Re-Entry Tears in Type B Aortic Dissection Progression: A Longitudinal Study Using a Controlled Swine Model.
Article in Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spectral Computed Tomography for the Detection and Characterization of Communications Between the True and the False Lumen in Aortic Dissections.Investigative radiology · 2026Article
- Thromboelastography and interleukin-6 predict postoperative negative remodeling of descending aorta in patients with type A aortic dissection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Article
- Mechanisms of aortic dissection: From pathological changes to experimental andProgress in materials science · 2025Article
- Through the gap: a case series on managing Type B aortic dissection with multiple lumens and tears.Future cardiology · 2025Article
- A fully coupled fluid-structure interaction model for patient-specific analysis of bioprosthetic aortic valve haemodynamics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Investigating the role of thrombosis and false lumen orbital orientation in the hemodynamics of Type B aortic dissection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Assessment of the re-entry tear index as a prognostic indicator for renal perfusion improvement after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with acute and subacute Stanford type b aortic dissection with renal artery involvement.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Transfer learning on physics-informed neural networks for tracking the hemodynamics in the evolving false lumen of dissected aorta.Nexus (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- A computational study of the effects of size, location, and number of tears on haemodynamics in surgically repaired type A aortic dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFalse lumen (FL) expansion often occurs in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) and has been associated with the presence of re-entry tears. This longitudinal study aims to elucidate the role of re-entry tears in the progression of TBAD using a controlled swine model, by assessing aortic hemodynamics through combined imaging and computational modeling. MATERIALS AND
methodsA TBAD swine model with a primary entry tear at 7 cm distal to the left subclavian artery was created in a previous study. In the current study, reintervention was carried out in this swine model to induce 2 additional re-entry tears of approximately 5 mm in diameter. Computed tomography (CT) and 4-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were taken at multiple follow-ups before and after reintervention. Changes in aortic volume were measured on CT scans, and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated based on dynamic data acquired with 4D-flow MRI and computational fluid dynamics simulations incorporating all available in vivo data.
resultsMorphological analysis showed FL growth of 20% following the initial TBAD-growth stabilized after the creation of additional tears and eventually FL volume reduced by 6%. Increasing the number of re-entry tears from 1 to 2 caused flow redistribution, with the percentage of true lumen (TL) flow increasing from 56% to 78%; altered local velocities; reduced wall shear stress surrounding the tears; and led to a reduction in FL pressure and pressure difference between the 2 lumina.
conclusionThis study combined extensive in vivo imaging data with sophisticated computational methods to show that additional re-entry tears can alter dissection hemodynamics through redistribution of flow between the TL and FL. This helps to reduce FL pressure, which could potentially stabilize aortic growth and lead to reversal of FL expansion. This work provides a starting point for further study into the use of fenestration in controlling undesirable FL expansion. CLINICAL IMPACT: Aortic growth and false lumen (FL) patency are associated with the presence of re-entry tears in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients. Guidelines on how to treat re-entry tears are lacking, especially with regards to the control and prevention of FL expansion. Through a combined imagining and computational hemodynamics study of a controlled swine model, we found that increasing the number of re-entry tears reduced FL pressure and cross lumen pressure difference, potentially stabilising aortic growth and leading to FL reduction. Our findings provide a starting point for further study into the use of fenestration in controlling undesirable FL expansion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.