ArticleThe oncologist2022
Implementation and Clinical Adoption of Precision Oncology Workflows Across a Healthcare Network.
Article in The oncologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Associated With Implementation of Biomarker Testing and Strategies to Improve Its Clinical Uptake in Cancer Care: Systematic Review Using Theoretical Domains Framework.JCO precision oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Implementation of the precision oncology program in catalonia's public health system: results, lessons learned, and future prospects.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Real-world genomic profiling of solid tumors: validation and clinical insights from a Brazilian cohort.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Precision Oncology: Current Landscape, Emerging Trends, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Cells · 2025Review
- Integrative diagnostic approach to salivary gland tumors: from clinical evaluation to molecularly targeted therapy.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Review
- Need Analysis of Clinician-Oriented Integrated Precision Oncology Decision Support Tools: Qualitative Descriptive Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Repurposing Metformin in Precision Oncology: Mechanistic Insights, Biomarker-Guided Strategies, and Translational Imperatives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Informatics at the Frontier of Cancer Research.Cancer research · 2025Review
- LH-RH agonist monotherapy for androgen receptor-positive recurrent and/or metastatic salivary gland cancer: a retrospective study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Editorial: Clinical implementation of precision oncology data to direct individualized and immunotherapy-based treatment strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Key considerations when implementing new diagnostic technologies in routine practice.Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Administrative Alignment for Integrated Diagnostics Leads to Shortened Time to Diagnose and Service Optimization.Radiology · 2024Article
- Slide-to-Slide Tissue Transfer and Array Assembly From Limited Samples for Comprehensive Molecular Profiling.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
50 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrecision oncology relies on molecular diagnostics, and the value-proposition of modern healthcare networks promises a higher standard of care across partner sites. We present the results of a clinical pilot to standardize precision oncology workflows.
methodsWorkflows are defined as the development, roll-out, and updating of disease-specific molecular order sets. We tracked the timeline, composition, and effort of consensus meetings to define the combination of molecular tests. To assess clinical impact, we examined order set adoption over a two-year period (before and after roll-out) across all gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary (GI) malignancies, and by provider location within the network.
resultsDevelopment of 12 disease center-specific order sets took ~9 months, and the average number of tests per indication changed from 2.9 to 2.8 (P = .74). After roll-out, we identified significant increases in requests for GI patients (17%; P < .001), compliance with testing recommendations (9%; P < .001), and the fraction of "abnormal" results (6%; P < .001). Of 1088 GI patients, only 3 received targeted agents based on findings derived from non-recommended orders (1 before and 2 after roll-out); indicating that our practice did not negatively affect patient treatments. Preliminary analysis showed 99% compliance by providers in network sites, confirming the adoption of the order sets across the network.
conclusionOur study details the effort of establishing precision oncology workflows, the adoption pattern, and the absence of harm from the reduction of non-recommended orders. Establishing a modifiable communication tool for molecular testing is an essential component to optimize patient care via precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.