Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35852418›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2022

Toward global integration of biodiversity big data: a harmonized metabarcode data generation module for terrestrial arthropods.

Paula Arribas, Carmelo Andújar, Kristine Bohmann, Jeremy R deWaard, Evan P Economo, Vasco Elbrecht, Stefan Geisen, Marta Goberna, Henrik Krehenwinkel, Vojtech Novotny and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Three steps towards comparability and standardization among molecular methods for characterizing insect communities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Paula ArribasIsland Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), 38206 San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0358-8271
Carmelo AndújarIsland Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), 38206 San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9759-7402
Kristine BohmannSection for Evolutionary Genomics, Globe Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7907-064X
Jeremy R deWaardCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, N1G2W1 Guelph, Canada.
Evan P EconomoBiodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, 904-0495 Japan.
Vasco ElbrechtCentre for Biodiversity Monitoring (ZBM), Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig,D-53113 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4672-7099
Stefan GeisenLaboratory of Nematology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, 6708PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0734-727X
Marta GobernaDepartment of Environment and Agronomy, INIA-CSIC, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5303-3429
Henrik KrehenwinkelDepartment of Biogeography, Trier University, D-54296 Trier, Germany.
Vojtech NovotnyBiology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7918-8023
Lucie ZingerInstitut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS), Département de biologie, École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3400-5825
Thomas J CreedyDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW7 5BD London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7611-291X
Emmanouil MeramveliotakisDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus.
Víctor NogueralesIsland Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), 38206 San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3185-778X
Isaac OvercastInstitut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS), Département de biologie, École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8614-6892
Hélène MorlonInstitut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS), Département de biologie, École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3195-7521
Anna PapadopoulouDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-4656-4894
Alfried P VoglerDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW7 5BD London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2462-3718
Brent C EmersonIsland Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), 38206 San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4067-9858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metazoan metabarcoding is emerging as an essential strategy for inventorying biodiversity, with diverse projects currently generating massive quantities of community-level data. The potential for integrating across such data sets offers new opportunities to better understand biodiversity and how it might respond to global change. However, large-scale syntheses may be compromised if metabarcoding workflows differ from each other. There are ongoing efforts to improve standardization for the reporting of inventory data. However, harmonization at the stage of generating metabarcode data has yet to be addressed. A modular framework for harmonized data generation offers a pathway to navigate the complex structure of terrestrial metazoan biodiversity. Here, through our collective expertise as practitioners, method developers, and researchers leading metabarcoding initiatives to inventory terrestrial biodiversity, we seek to initiate a harmonized framework for metabarcode data generation, with a terrestrial arthropod module. We develop an initial set of submodules covering the 5 main steps of metabarcode data generation: (i) sample acquisition; (ii) sample processing; (iii) DNA extraction; (iv) polymerase chain reaction amplification, library preparation, and sequencing; and (v) DNA sequence and metadata deposition, providing a backbone for a terrestrial arthropod module. To achieve this, we (i) identified key points for harmonization, (ii) reviewed the current state of the art, and (iii) distilled existing knowledge within submodules, thus promoting best practice by providing guidelines and recommendations to reduce the universe of methodological options. We advocate the adoption and further development of the terrestrial arthropod module. We further encourage the development of modules for other biodiversity fractions as an essential step toward large-scale biodiversity synthesis through harmonization.

Indexed as

ArthropodsAnimalsBiodiversityDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicLongitudinal Studiesarthropodsbiodiversity big data integrationbiodiversity inventorycomparabilitydata generationharmonizationmetabarcodingmodular structurereproducibility

Identifiers

PMID35852418
PMCPMC9295367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.