Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35852055›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of primary health care2022

Strategies for achieving efficiency in the general practitioner's everyday life.

Kok-Wing Giang, Josefine L Lilja

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kok-Wing GiangResearch, Development, Education and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Götaland, Sweden.
Josefine L LiljaResearch, Development, Education and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Götaland, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe concrete, effective strategies used by experienced GPs to achieve time efficiency, increase patient satisfaction and maintain high medical quality during patient meetings.

designQualitative observation yielded field notes for qualitative content analysis according to Graneheim and Lundman. Follow-up telephone interviews were conducted to get feedback from patients.

settingA normal working day with patient meetings in a primary health care center in Sweden. SUBJECTS: Five GPs known for being experienced and well-functioning clinicians were strategically chosen to participate in an observational study during patient meetings. Afterwards a random selection of 25 patients (five from each GP) were asked to rate their experience of their meeting.

resultsObservation and analysis of GPs' work before, during, and after patient meetings revealed several concrete strategies, which we classified into two main categories:

conclusionMost important behavioral skills for time efficiency were a GP's ability to handle interruptions, and effective administration. Medical quality during patient meetings was most supported by GP continuity and relationship, an exploratory patient-centered approach, a focus on one task at a time, and the ability to acknowledge and learn from medical uncertainty. Patients were most satisfied with GPs who had good communicative skills, good GP continuity and relationship.Key pointsThe changing field of general medicine requires general practitioners (GPs), to work efficiently, but studies on effective work strategies for GPs are scarce.GPs used several concrete strategies falling into two broad categories (behavioral and communicative) that may also be important for other practitioners wishing to improve their methods in clinical patient work.The most important strategies for time efficiency were mainly behavioral; for medical quality during patient meetings, a mix of behavioral and communicative; and for patient satisfaction, communicative.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationHumansPatient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchSwedenclinical competenceClinical practicecommunicationfamily medicinegeneral medicinegeneral practitionerspatient-centered care

Identifiers

PMID35852055
PMCPMC9397421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.